Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 4]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Religare Finvest Limited vs Vijay Steel Tubes And Fittings Private ... on 13 June, 2012

Author: Ravi Malimath

Bench: Ravi Malimath

                     -   1   -


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

       DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2012

                     BEFORE

    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

        COMPANY APPLICATION NO.398/2011
                      IN
          COMPANY PETITION NO.70/2011

BETWEEN:


M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED
NO.8, 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN
80 FEET ROAD, S T BED AREA
KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-34
REP BY MR ALI HASKAR
OFFICER AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
                                ... APPLICANT
(BY M/S.M G C & CO., ADVS.)


AND:


VIJAY STEEL TUBES AND FITTINGS
PRIVATE LIMITED
REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.14,
1ST FLOOR, 4TH CROSS, NALA CROSS
LAL BAGH ROAD
BANGALORE-560027.
                                ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI RAGHAVENDRA C, ADV.)


    THE COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER
ORDER XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC R/W. RULES 6
AND 9 OF THE COMPANIES COURT RULES, 1959
                           -    2    -


SEEKING AD-INTERIM ORDER TO RESTRAIN THE
RESPONDENT    -   COMPANY,    ITS  DIRECTORS,
MANAGERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, OFFICERS AND
EMPLOYEESS FROM IN ANY MANNER DEALING
WITH/DISPOSING    OFF    OR    PARTING   WITH
POSSESSION,   ALIENATING,   TRANSFERRING   OR
SELLING OR ENCUMBERING OR CREATING THIRD
PARTY RIGHTS OR ANY OF THE ASSETS AND
PROPERTIES OF THE RESPONDENT - COMPANY.


     THE APPLICATION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-


                          ORDER

This Company Application is filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC r/w. Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies Court Rules, 1959 seeking ad-interim order to restrain the respondent - Company, its Directors, Managers etc. from in any manner dealing with/disposing off or parting with possession, alienating, transferring or selling or encumbering or creating third party rights or any of the assets and properties of the respondent - Company. It was filed on 12.4.2011. However, Company Application No.398/2011 has been allowed and the respondent- Company is ordered to be wound up by the order dated

- 3 -

16.4.2012. Consequently, the application being infructuous is dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE nas.