Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Mrs. Suman Lata D/O Sujinder Singh vs The Government Of Nct Of Delhi Through on 27 May, 2011

      

  

  

 Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench


OA 1925/2011

New Delhi, this the 27th day of May, 2011

Honble Mr. Justice V.K. Bali, Chairman
Honble Mr. L.K. Joshi, Vice Chairman(A)

Mrs. Suman Lata d/o Sujinder Singh,
R/o H.No. 1262, Sonepat.
Presently R/o Flat No. 252, C & D Block,
Pocket-1, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi88.				Applicant

(By Advocate: Mr. Malaya Chand)

Versus

1.	The Government of NCT of Delhi through
	The Secretary (Education),
	Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi,
	Old Secretariat, Delhi
	Ex Officio the Chairman, State Council of Educational, 
Research &	Training, Delhi.

2.	The Director,
	State Council of Educational, Research &
	Training, Varun Marg,
Defence Colony, New Delhi.

3.	The Secretary,
	State Council of Educational, Research &
	Training, Varun Marg,
Defence Colony, New Delhi.

4.	Mrs. Meenakshi Yadav, Sr. Lecturer, Work Ex-and V.E.
5.	Mrs. Seema Yadav, Sr. Lecturer, Elementary Education and NFE
6.	Dr. Jagbir Singh, Sr. Lecturer, District Resource Unit.
	(Respondent nos. 4 to 6 through the Director, 
State Council of Educational Research & Training, 
Varun Marg, Defence Colony, New Delhi).
								          Respondents

ORDER (ORAL)

Justice V.K. Bali, Chairman:

After arguing for some time Mr. Malaya, counsel representing the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present Original Application with liberty to file fresh one wherein all necessary particulars as regards merit position of the applicant and the chances that the applicant would have for his selection if such of the respondents, who could not be appointed, were not to be appointed, shall be given. It shall further be pleaded as to how the private respondents, who also belong to OBC like the applicant, should not be considered for appointment in the OBC category

2. With leave and liberty, as asked for, present Original Application is dismissed as withdrawn.

     (L.K. Joshi)						     (V.K. Bali)
Vice Chairman (A)						     Chairman

/naresh/