Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Vikas S/O. Shripatrao Shinde vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 October, 2019

Author: V.K. Jadhav

Bench: V.K. Jadhav

                                       1                   ABA 1245.2019.odt

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

           5 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1245 OF 2019

                       VIKAS S/O. SHRIPATRAO SHINDE
                                     VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                        ...
                   Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Waghpatil D. M. &
                             Mr. Ghule Aniruddha B.
                   APP for Respondent-State : Mr R. V. Dasalkar
                                        ...
                            CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.
                             Dated: October 14, 2019
                                         ...
     PER COURT :-

     1.      The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection

     with Crime No.0144 of 2019 registered with Palam Police

     Station, Taluka Palam, District Parbhani for the ofences

     punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 of Indian

     Penal Code. His application with similar prayer bearing Criminal

     Misc. Application No. 144 of 2019 came to be rejected by the

     learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, District

     Parbhani.


     2.      Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the

     applicant is a Consulting Engineer and he is supposed to

     maintain the technical quality of construction so far as the

     construction work of roads and drainage in ward nos. 1 to 17 of

     Nagar Panchayat Palam is concerned.                  Learned counsel

     submits that the allegations have been made to the extent that

     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 14/10/2019                       ::: Downloaded on - 15/10/2019 04:36:14 :::
                                     2                  ABA 1245.2019.odt

     because of some incorrect entries taken by the applicant in the

     measurement book, some excessive amount to the tune of

     Rs.11.00 Lakh and some odd amount came to be paid to the

     contractor. Learned counsel submits that the said contractor

     has deposited the aforesaid amount with Nagar Panchayat

     Palam and it is so mentioned in the complaint itself. Learned

     counsel submits that even the applicant has submitted his

     explanation in detail to the queries made by the committee

     appointed by the Collector and headed by the Deputy Engineer

     and other Engineers of the Nagar Panchayat Palam. Learned

     counsel submits that in the given set of the allegations, custodial

     interrogation of the applicant is not required. All the relevant

     documents, including the measurement book, are already

     seized in connection with the present crime. The applicant is

     not in service of the Nagar Panchayat and as such, there is no

     question of tampering with the prosecution evidence. The

     applicant may be released on anticipatory bail.



     3.      Learned APP has strongly resisted the application on the

     ground that the applicant has prepared false and fabricated

     record of measurement of the work carried out by the contractor

     in respect of the construction of roads and drainage in ward nos.

     1 to 17 of Nagar Panchayat Palam and as a result thereof, an


     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 14/10/2019                   ::: Downloaded on - 15/10/2019 04:36:14 :::
                                    3                  ABA 1245.2019.odt

     excess amount came to be paid to the contractor. Even though

     the contractor has deposited the said amount with Nagar

     Panchayat Palam, however, it cannot be ignored that because

     of the false and fabricated documents prepared by the applicant

     an excess amount has been paid to the contractor. Learned

     counsel submits that even the Collector has given directions to

     file a complaint against the applicant and accordingly this

     complaint came to be filed. The applicant may not be released

     on anticipatory bail.



     4.      On going through the allegations made in the complaint

     and on perusal of the investigation papers, it appears that there

     are no antecedents of the applicant. The applicant is working as

     Consulting Engineer. Though certain entries are incorrectly

     taken in the measurement book with regard to the quality of

     construction work of the roads and drainage and even though

     the contractor has completed the work to the extent of amount of

     Rs. 48.00 lakh and some odd amount, the allegations have been

     made to the extent that an excess amount of Rs. 11.00 lakh and

     some odd amount has been paid to the contractor on account of

     the said incorrect entries. It has been alleged in the complaint

     that the applicant has failed to maintain the quality of work.

     However, it cannot be ignored that a substantial amount has


     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 14/10/2019                  ::: Downloaded on - 15/10/2019 04:36:14 :::
                                        4                   ABA 1245.2019.odt

     been paid to the contractor without questioning the work already

     carried out by him. Apart from this, said contractor has

     deposited the aforesaid amount of Rs.11.00 lakh and some odd

     amount in the Nagar Panchayat Palam. Thus, considering the

     same, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the applicant

     is required. I am thus inclined to allow this application with

     certain conditions to facilitate further investigation into the crime.

     Hence, following order.

                                   ORDER

1. The application is hereby allowed.

2. In the event of the arrest of the applicant VIKAS S/ O. SHRIPATRAO SHINDE in connection with Crime No.0144 of 2019 registered with Palam Police Station, Taluka Palam, District Parbhani for the ofences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code, he be released on bail on his furnishing P.B. of Rs.15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen Thousand) with one surety of the like amount on the following conditions :-

a] The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.
b] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station once in a week i.e. on every Sunday between 8 am to 11 am till filing of the charge sheet.
aaa/-
::: Uploaded on - 14/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 15/10/2019 04:36:14 :::
5 ABA 1245.2019.odt

3. Application is accordingly disposed of.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ...

aaa/-

::: Uploaded on - 14/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 15/10/2019 04:36:14 :::