Chattisgarh High Court
Maan Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh 13 Wpc/2468/2018 ... on 10 September, 2018
Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra
Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 2472 of 2018
1. Maan Singh S/o Kapil Singh Verma Aged About 55 Years
2. Kaushal S/o Paltan Aged About 41 Years
3. Dhruv S/o Jhadu Lodhi, Aged About 46 Years
All R/o Village Daganiya, Thana & Tehsil Than, Khamhariya,
District Bemetara (C.G.)
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department,
Mantralay, Post Office Rakhi New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District :
Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Collector, Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.,
District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Than Khamhariya, District Bemetara
Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
4. The Tahsildar Than Khamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.,
District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
5. Aghanu, S/o Bhagela Aged About 30 Years Caste - Paradhi
6. Kalyan S/o Ishvar Aged About 42 Years Caste - Lodhi
7. Vishnu S/o Khelan Aged About 25 Years Caste - Dhobi
8. Nakul S/o Mangala Aged About 42 Years Caste- Raut (Yadav)
9. Phaguva S/o Paltu Yadav @ Mahesh, Aged About 45 Years
Caste - Raut (Yadav)
10. Narsingh S/o Sitaram Aged About 27 Years Caste - Lodhi
11. Savitri D/o Rameshar Aged About 50 Years Caste - Lodhi
12. Lokeshwari D/o Khilawan Aged About 25 Years Caste - Paradhi
13. Guha S/o Govind Aged About 60 Years Caste - Lodhi
14. Sukhdev S/o Bhuruv Aged About 28 Years Caste - Raut
15. Sitaram S/o Pakalu Aged About 25 Years Caste - Lodhi
16. Gajadhar S/o Badri Lodhi, Aged About 50 Years
17. Baldau S/o Paras Lodhi Aged About 45 Years
18. Gajanan S/o Paretan Dhobi Aged About 28 Years
Respondent Nos.5 to 18 are R/o Village - Daganiya, Post -
Hatranka, Thana and Tahsil - Than Khamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents For Petitioners Shri Bharat Rajput, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri P. K. Bhaduri, GA Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 10/09/2018
1. The order under challenge passed by the Tehsildar is appealable before the superior Revenue Officer under Section 44 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
Sd/-
Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala