Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad

Shri Sendhabhai M.Desai,, Mehsana vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2,, ... on 29 September, 2017

       IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                   AHMEDABAD "SMC" BENCH

(BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
       & SHRI S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER)

                  ITA. Nos: 3434 & 3435/AHD/2015
                     (Assessment Year: 2009-10)

     Shri Popatlal Vandas Patel V/S Income Tax Officer, Ward-
     11/B,   Shreyas    Society     2, Mehsana
     Rotary Bhavan Opp. Jail
     Mehsana
     PAN No. ABHPP6099G
     and Shri Sendhabhai M
     Desai 12, Prakash Society,
     Radhanpur           Road,
     Mehsana
     PAN No. AAWPD3235Cs
     (Appellant)                     (Respondent)

       Appellant by     : Shri Sunil Talati, AR
       Respondent by    : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr. D.R.

                             (आदे श)/ORDER

Date of hearing            : 29 -09-2017
Date of Pronouncement      : 29 -09-2017

PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1. ITA Nos. 3434 & 3435/Ahd/2015 are two appeals by two different Assessees preferred against two separate orders of the Ld. CIT(A), Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad dated 12.10.2015 pertaining to A.Y. 2009-10.

2 ITA Nos. 3434 & 3435/Ahd/2015

. A.Y. 2009-10

2. Since common grievance is involved in both these appeals, they were heard together and are disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity.

3. Both these appeals relate to the levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act, though quantum of penalty may differ.

4. At the very outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee stated that the additions made in the impugned assessment were deleted by the Tribunal by a consolidated order dated 14.06.2016. It is the say of the ld. counsel that since the quantum additions have been deleted, there should not be any levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act.

5. The ld. D.R. fairly conceded to this.

6. We have carefully considered the orders of the authorities below. We find force in the contention of the ld. counsel. The Tribunal by a consolidated order dated 14.06.2016 had the occasion to consider the quantum additions made in the respective hands. We find that the additions have been deleted by the Tribunal in ITA Nos. 484/Ahd/2012 & 482/Ahd/2012. Since the foundation has been removed, the super structure must fall. We accordingly direct the A.O. to delete the penalty so levied from the respective hands.

3 ITA Nos. 3434 & 3435/Ahd/2015

. A.Y. 2009-10

7. In the result, both these appeals are allowed.




           Order pronounced in Open Court on        29 - 09- 2017


           Sd/-                                                     Sd/-
  (S. S. GODARA)                                          (N. K. BILLAIYA)
 JUDICIAL MEMBER True Copy                              ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Ahmedabad: Dated 29/09/2017
Rajesh

Copy of the Order forwarded to:-
1.    The Appellant.
2.    The Respondent.
3.    The CIT (Appeals) -
4.    The CIT concerned.
5.    The DR., ITAT, Ahmedabad.
6.    Guard File.
                                                          By ORDER




                                                  Deputy/Asstt.Registrar
                                                    ITAT,Ahmedabad