Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 vs Videocon Industries Ltd on 12 July, 2023

Author: K.R. Shriram

Bench: K.R. Shriram

                                                   1/2                               2-ITXA-434-2018.doc




       Digitally
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
       signed by
       PURTI
PURTI PRASAD             ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PRASAD PARAB
PARAB Date:
       2023.07.12
       18:20:07
       +0530
                             INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 434 OF 2018

The Principal Commissioner of Income
Tax - 3                                                                     ....Appellant
      V/s.
Videocon Industries Ltd.                                                    ...Respondent
                                                   ----
Mr. Suresh Kumar for Appellant.
                                                  ----
                                               CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
                                                       FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

DATED : 12th JULY 2023 P.C. :

1. Mr. Suresh Kumar states that in Income Tax Appeal No. 863 of 2017 the following order has been passed :
1. At the outset Mr. Pillai appearing for respondent states that the company is not in liquidation but National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has approved a resolution plan and seeks leave to suitably amend the cause title.
2. Leave to amend granted. Amendment to be carried out within one week.
3. Mr. Pillai states that the moratorium granted by NCLT originally is still in force. Mr. Suresh Kumar states the appeal be therefore stood over sine die because the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) itself is under challenge before the Hon'ble Apex Court.
4. Adjourned sine die. Liberty to apply.
5. Reverification dispensed with.

2. Therefore, here also we grant two weeks time to appellant to amend the cause title and bring Resolution Professional on record. Amendment to be carried out and amended appeal to be served within two weeks.

Purti Parab




          ::: Uploaded on - 12/07/2023                              ::: Downloaded on - 13/07/2023 13:04:49 :::
                                             2/2                        2-ITXA-434-2018.doc




3. Adjourned sine die. Liberty to apply.

4. Re-verification dispensed with. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Purti Parab ::: Uploaded on - 12/07/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 13/07/2023 13:04:49 :::