Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Chattisgarh High Court

Doman Tondon vs Regional Transport Authority 19 ... on 20 March, 2019

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

1                                                     WPC No. 1087 of 2019


                                                                    NAFR

          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                        WPC No. 1087 of 2019

       Doman Tondon, S/o Shri Rajendra Tondon, Aged About 32 Years,
       R/o Satnam Chowk, Purani Basti, Balodabazar, District -
       Balodabazar, Chhattisgarh.

                                                          ---- Petitioner

                                   Versus

     1. Regional Transport Authority, Raipur Chhattisgarh.


     2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Office Of R.T.O. Raipur
        Chhattisgarh.

                                                      ---- Respondents

For Petitioner :- Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State :- Shri Ashish Surana, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 20/03/2019

1. Grievance of the petitioner is that he has moved an application before the respondents on 05.12.2018 for grant of regular stage carriage permit on the route Raipur to Sarsiva via Kharora, Balodabazar, Kasdol, Gidhori, Bhatgaon, and one return trip daily which is pending consideration.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to 2 WPC No. 1087 of 2019 decide the said application, expeditiously.

3. Learned State counsel would submit that the application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided along with all pending applications for the concerned route, in accordance with law and on its own merits as expeditiously as possible.

4. In view of the fact that petitioner's application is pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the petitioner's application and all other applications pending before it for the concerned route, within 30 days from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/-

(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Ayushi