Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Gangadharaswamy vs The Union Of India on 13 November, 2020

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                         -1-


 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

 DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020

                      BEFORE

       THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R DEVDAS

     WRIT PETITION NO.45471 OF 2018 (S-RES)

BETWEEN

1.    GANGADHARASWAMY
      S/O BYRAIAH
      AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
      RESIDING AT NO.39,
      MADDAIAHNA HUNDI VILLAGE
      HANGALA HOBLI
      GUDLUPET TALUK
      CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK-571111

2.    MALLESH M
      S/O MARIYAPPA
      AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
      RESIDING AT MEDAR CAMP
      SHANTHINAGAR
      B R P POST
      BHADRAVATHI TALUK
      SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT
                                      ...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI B M HALA SWAMY, ADV.)

AND

1.    THE UNION OF INDIA
      REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
      MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
      ROOM NO.48, KRISHI BHAWAN
      DR RAJENDRA PRASAD MARG
      NEW DELHI-110001

2.    NATIONAL RURAL LIVELIHOODS MISSION (NRLM)
      6TH FLOOR, HOTEL SAMRAT KAUTILYA MARG
      CHANAKYAPURI, NEW DELHI-110021
                          -2-


3.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
     MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND
     PANCHAYATH RAJ
     VIKASASOUDHA
     BANGALORE-560001.

4.   KARNATAKA STATE RURAL LIVELIHOOD MISSION
     SANJEEVINI
     5TH FLOOR, KANIJA BHAVAN
     RACECOURSE ROAD
     BENGALURU-560001
     REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE
     OFFICER/MISSION DIRECTOR
                                   ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT L.MANJULA, ADV. FOR R1 & R2,
 SMT. VANI H, AGA FOR R3,
 SMT. RAKSHITHA D.J, ADV. FOR R4.)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE NOTIFICATION DTD:6.2.2018 ISSUED BY THE R-4
ANNEXURE-D AND THE ENTIRE SELECTION PROCESS FOR
THE APPOINTMENT AS ILLEGAL.

      THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR 'ORDERS' THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                        ORDER

R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

Learned Counsel for respondent No.4 has filed a memo dated 13.10.2020 stating that the impugned Notification dated 06.02.2018 has been withdrawn in terms of the Notification dated 02.04.2019 and -3- therefore nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition.

2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.

3. In view of the statement made in the memo dated 13.10.2020, the writ petition stands disposed of as nothing further survives for consideration.

SD/-

JUDGE DL CT-HR