Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

C.I.T vs M/S Century Park on 1 April, 2015

Bench: Chief Justice, Arun Mishra

                                                    1

  ITEM NO.23                                COURT NO.1                 SECTION IIIA

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

  Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC         No(s).
  5289/2013
  (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/03/2012
  in ITA No. 1006/2006 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka at
  Bangalore)

  C.I.T & ANR                                                              Petitioner(s)

                                                   VERSUS

  M/S CENTURY PARK                                   Respondent(s)
  (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling
  SLP and office report)

  Date : 01/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

  CORAM :
                         HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

  For Petitioner(s)                 Mr.Ranjit    Kumar, Sol.Genl.of India
                                    Ms.Shirin    Khajuria, Adv.
                                    Mr.Sanjai    Kumar Pathak, Adv.
                                    Mrs. Anil    Katiyar,Adv.


  For Respondent(s)

                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated 9th February, 2011, should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income Tax Act, 1961, Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of Ramana Venkata Ganti Date: 2015.04.01 14:41:10 IST Reason: matters or large number of matters. In our view, in such cases if attention of the High Court is drawn, the High Court will not 2 apply the Circular ipso facto. For that purpose, liberty is granted to the Department to move the High Court in six weeks' time from today.

The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

(G.V.Ramana)                                          (Vinod Kulvi)
Court Master                                          Asstt.Registrar