Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 26]

Gujarat High Court

Gujarat Mineral Development ... vs Simplex Infrastructure Limited on 30 January, 2017

Bench: M.R. Shah, B.N. Karia

          C/CA/1203/2017                                                                          ORDER



            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                           CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1203 of 2017

                                  In FIRST APPEAL NO.  618 of 2017
         =============================================
             GUJARAT MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD....Applicant(s)
                                      Versus
                   SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED....Respondent(s)
         =============================================
         Appearance:
         MR SN SOPARKAR, SR. ADVOCATE with MR G H VIRK, ADVOCATE for the 
         Applicant(s) No. 1
         =============================================
           CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
                  and
                  HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
                                 Date : 30/01/2017
                                   ORAL ORDER

  (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH) RULE. Shri Bhash Mankad, learned Advocate waives service  of   notice   of   Rule   on   behalf   of   the   respondent.   In   the   facts   and  circumstances   of   the   case   and   with   the   consent   of   learned  Advocates   appearing  for  respective   parties,   present  application   is  taken up for final hearing today.

Present   application   has   been   preferred   by   the   applicant  herein   -   original   opponent   to   stay   further   implementation,  execution   and   operation   of   the   impugned   order   passed   by   the  learned Commercial Court, impugned in the main First Appeal.

Shri Krishna Vijay Singh, learned Counsel appearing with Ms.  Garima   Malhotra,   learned   Advocate   for   Shri   Bhash   Mankad,  learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent has stated  at the Bar that the respondent shall not take any further steps to  execute   the   impugned   order   passed   by   the   learned   Commercial  Court, impugned in the main First Appeal, till the final disposal of  the main First Appeal. He has stated at the Bar that he has given  Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Tue Jan 31 02:14:25 IST 2017 C/CA/1203/2017 ORDER the aforesaid concession at this stage as the main First Appeal is  fixed for final hearing on 10.02.2017. However, has requested to  reserve   the   liberty   in   favour   of   the   respondent   to   move   an  appropriate   application   for   modification   of   the   present   order   in  case the appeal is not heard within reasonable time. 

In view of the above, the concerned respondents are directed  to act as stated hereinabove. In view of the above, no further order  is  required to  be passed  at this stage. Present application   stands  disposed of accordingly. 

Sd/­          (M.R. SHAH, J.)  Sd/­          (B.N. KARIA, J.)  Ajay Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Tue Jan 31 02:14:25 IST 2017