Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 9]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Om Dutt vs State Of H.P. And Others on 14 July, 2020

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Jyotsna Rewal Dua

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
                                              CWP No.1694 of 2020
                                Decided on: 14th July, 2020




                                                                            .
    ____________________________________________________________





    Om Dutt                                         .....Petitioner
                          Versus





    State of H.P. and others                    ......Respondents
    _____________________________________________________________
    Coram
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge





    The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
    1Whether approved for reporting?
    ______________________________________________________
    For the petitioner:        Mr. Pratap Singh Goverdhan,

                               Advocate,      through      Video

                               Conferencing.
    For the respondents:                      Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate
                                              General, with Mr. Vikas Rathore,
                                              Mr. Vinod Thakur and Mr. Desh


                                              Raj Thakur, Additional Advocates
                                              General and Mr. Bhupinder
                                              Thakur,     Deputy      Advocate




                                              General, for respondent No.1-
                                              State,       through       Video
                                              Conferencing.





                                              Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan,
                                              Advocate, for respondents No.2 to





                                              4, through Video Conferencing.
    Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)

The parties are at ad idem that the issue in question is no longer res integra in view of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.3050 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2020 20:22:39 :::HCHP -2-

of 2014, titled Nek Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014.

.

2. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of on the basis of the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment.

3. Consequently, the respondents are directed to release all the pensionary and retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of three months from today and thereafter pension shall be released to him regularly on first day of each month.

4. However, it is made clear that in case the pensionary and retiral benefits are not extended to the petitioner within the aforesaid time, then in addition to the pensionary and retiral benefits, even the petitioner shall also be entitled to interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the due date. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs. For compliance, list on 15th October, 2020.




                                        (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
                                                Judge


                                           (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
    July 14, 2020                                Judge
         (VS/Mukesh)




                                           ::: Downloaded on - 14/07/2020 20:22:39 :::HCHP