Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Passed By : Commr. (Appeals), C.Ex. & ... vs Represented By : None, Written ... on 1 April, 2010

        

 
CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
West Zonal Bench, Ahmedabad



Application No.	:	E/S/1774 of 2009

Appeal No.		:	E/1638 of 2009
					
Arising out of 	:	OIA No. 219/2009 (Ahd-II) CE/CMC/Commr(A)/Ahd/
					S/ (S-A-II)/09 dated 31.7.2009.
					
Passed by 		:  	Commr. (Appeals), C.Ex. & Cus., Ahmedabad 

Appellant (s)	:	M/s. Hipolin Limited

Represented by	:	None, Written submission.  

Respondent (s)	:	Commissioner, C. Excise Ahmedabad

Represented by : Shri S.K. Mall, SDR CORAM :

Honble Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, Member (Technical) Date of Hearing : 01.04.2010 Date of Decision : 01.04.2010 ORDER No. _____________ /WZB/AHD/2010 Per : Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, Vide order No. S/58/WZB/AHD/2010 dated 28.1.2010, the appellants were required to deposit entire duty amount demanded, within eight weeks and report compliance today. When the matter came up for compliance before Assistant Registrar, the appellant submitted a letter seeking additional six weeks time to comply with the directions of the stay order. However, in the letter appellants have also mentioned that they were required to make pre-deposit of 50% of duty involved.

2. Appellants seem to be under a wrong impression that they are required to deposit 50% of the duty demanded. It is made clear that stay order required the appellants to deposit full duty of amount demanded. In the interest of justice, extension of time for six weeks for making deposit, as sought for by the appellant is allowed and appellant is required to report compliance on 20.5.2010. (Dictated and pronounced in the Court) (B.S.V. Murthy) Member (Technical) KL 2