Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

D.A.Armstrong vs / on 12 August, 2022

Author: M.S.Ramesh

Bench: M.S.Ramesh

                                                                              WP(MD)No.12305 of 2022

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                  DATED: 12.08.2022

                                                      CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

                                            W.P.(MD)No.12305 of 2022

                 D.A.Armstrong                                                          ... Petitioner

                                                         /vs./

                 1.The District Collector,
                   O/o. The District Collector,
                   Virudhunagar District,
                   Virudhuangar.

                 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                   O/o. The Revenue Divisional Office,
                   Sivakasi,
                   Virudhunagar District.

                 3.The Tahsildar,
                   Sivakasi,
                   Virudhunagar District.                                          ... Respondents

                 PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                 issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide 75 percent of
                 subsistence allowance to the petitioner from 22.11.2019 to till the revocation of
                 suspension by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2020 with
                 the consequential benefits within the time stipulated by this Court.

                 1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      WP(MD)No.12305 of 2022

                                  For Petitioner      :   Mr.T.Thirumurugan
                                  For Respondents :       Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia
                                                          Special Government Pleader


                                                               ORDER

The petitioner herein was placed under suspension by the respondents on 22.05.2019 and still continues to be under suspension.

2.Under FR 53(1)(a) of the Fundamental Rules of the Tamil Nadu Government [hereinafter referred to as the “Rules” for brevity], a Government Servant, who is placed under suspension shall be entitled for receiving subsistence allowance at an amount equal to half of the pay last drawn pay by him and in addition dearness allowance and incase where the period of suspension exceeds six months, subsistence allowance shall be increased.

3.FR 53(1) of the Rules reads as follows:

“F.R. 53. (1) A Government servant who is placed or deemed to have or continues to be under suspension shall be entitled to the following payments, namely:-
(a) Subsistence allowance at an amount equal to half of the pay last drawn by the Government servant and in addition dearness allowance, if admissible on the basis of half of been 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.12305 of 2022 placed the pay last drawn:
(G.O. Ms. No. 180, P & A.R. Department, dated 4th March 1983.) Provided that where the period of suspension exceeds six months, the authority which made or is deemed to have made, the order of suspension shall be competent to vary the amount of subsistence allowance for any period subsequent to the period of the first six months as follows:-
(i) The amount of subsistence allowance may be increased by a suitable amount, not exceeding fifty per cent of the subsistence allowance admissible during the period of the first six months, if, in the opinion of the said authority, the period of suspension has been prolonged for reasons to be recorded in writing, not directly attributable to the Government servant;
(ii) the amount of subsistence allowance may be reduced by a suitable amount, not exceeding fifty per cent of the subsistence allowance admissible during the period of the first six months, if, in the opinion of the said authority, the period of suspension has been prolonged for reasons to be recorded in writing, directly attributable to the Government servant;
(iii) the amount of dearness allowance shall be based on the increase or the decrease in the amount of subsistence allowance, as the case may be, admissible under clause (i) or
(ii) above:” 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.12305 of 2022

4.The petitioner's claim for enhanced subsistence allowance has been kept pending without consideration, which insisted him to file this writ petition. Since the petitioner is under suspension for more than six months, he would be entitled for enhanced subsistence allowance, as per FR 53(1) of the Rules, as extracted above.

5.In the light of this finding, there shall be a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2020 seeking for enhanced compensation and pass appropriate orders, for payment of enhanced compensation, in accordance with FR 53(1) of the Rules, together with arrears of such subsistence allowance, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

12.08.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sm 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.12305 of 2022 To:

1.The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhuangar.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Office, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Tahsildar, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.
5/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD)No.12305 of 2022 M.S.RAMESH, J.

Sm Order made in W.P.(MD)No.12305 of 2022 Dated:

12.08.2022 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis