Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

Strides Arcolab Ltd, Navi Mumbai vs Asst Cit Cir 10(3), Mumbai on 26 August, 2022

               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                         "J" BENCH, MUMBAI


 BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
    SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


               SA Nos. 92 & 93/MUM/2022
[ARISING OUT OF ITA.No. 124/MUM/2013 (A.Y. 2008-09) AND
         ITA NO. 2877/MUM/2014 (A.Y. 2009-10)]


  Strides Pharma Science Limited                 v.   ACIT - Circle - 10(3)
  (Earlier known as Strides Shasun Ltd., /            Room No. 451, 4th Floor
  Strides Arcolab Ltd.,)                              Aayakar Bhavan
  201, Devarata, Sector - 17, Vashi                   M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020
  Navi Mumbai - 400703

  PAN: AADCS8104P

  (Appellant)                                         (Respondent)

          Assessee by                        :        Shri Ninad Patade
          Department by                      :        Shri Samuel Pitta


          Date of Hearing                    :        26.08.2022
          Date of Pronouncement              :        26.08.2022


                                   ORDER

PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (AM)

1. These stay applications have been filed by the assessee for seeking extension of stay of recovery of outstanding demand in 2 SA Nos. 92 & 93/MUM/2022 Strides Pharma Science L td., ITA.No.124/Mum/2013 for A.Y. 2008-09 and ITA.No. 2877/Mum/2014 for A.Y: 2009-10.

2. At the time of hearing, Ld. AR of the assessee brought to our notice that assessee is seeking extension of stay in the appeals in ITA.No. 124/Mum/2013 for A.Y. 2008-09 and ITA.No. 2877/Mum/2014 for A.Y: 2009-10 for which assessee has already got the extension of stay in S.A.Nos. 6 & 7/Mum/2022 dated 28.01.2022. He brought to our notice that the above said two appeals are already heard by the Coordinate Bench and are awaiting for orders. Ld. AR of the assessee prayed for extension of stay for a period of 90 days.

3. On the other hand, Ld.DR fairly accepted the facts submitted by the assessee.

4. Considered the rival submissions and material placed on record, we observe that assessee is seeking extension of stay granted earlier by the bench in S.A. Nos. 6 & 7/Mum/2022 dated 28.01.2022. It is brought to our notice that the above said appeals were already heard by the Coordinate Bench and the order is awaited. Considering the facts available on record, we are inclined to extend the stay granted 3 SA Nos. 92 & 93/MUM/2022 Strides Pharma Science L td., earlier for a further period of 60 days from the date of this order or till pronouncement of the order, whichever is earlier.

5. In the result the stay applications are disposed off as indicated above.

Order pronounced in the open court on 26th August, 2022.

   Sd/-                                           Sd/-
(VIKAS AWASTHY)                                 (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                                 ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Mumbai; Dated: 26/08/2022
Giridhar, Sr.PS

Copy of the Order forwarded to:

1.   The Appellant
2.   The Respondent
3.   The CIT(A)
4.   CIT- concerned
5.    DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6.   Guard File


                                                    BY ORDER,


                                                 (Asstt. Registrar)
                                                 ITAT, Mumbai.