Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Amarjit Pal Singh vs Delhi Police on 29 August, 2013

                           Central Information Commission
            Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhavan,
                        Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi­110066
                        Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931

                                                        Case No. CIC/SS/A/2012/003652
                                                                       August 29, 2013



Appellant                      :       Shri Amarjeetpal Singh

Respondents            :       Delhi Police
 
Date of Hearing                :       26.08.2013

                                          ORDER

The present appeal, filed by Shri Amarjeetpal Singh against  Delhi Police,  was   taken   up   for   hearing   on   26.08.2013   when   the   Respondents   were   present  through Shri S.V. Singh Duhan, ACP and Shri Satya Prakash, S.I. The Appellant  was present in person.

Facts of the case:

2. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 30.06.2012 with the CPIO, Delhi  Police, New Delhi seeking certain information regarding complaint cases registered  against a firm, namely, M. Tech Developer by Delhi Police. He also mentioned an  CIC/SS/A/2012/003652 Page 1 of 5 2 FIR   No.   160/09   dt.   01.08.2009   u/s   420/120B   I.P.C.   registered   against   M.   Tech  Developer and requested for a copy of the same.
3. The   CPIO   vide   his   letter   dated   30.07.2012   declined   the   disclosure   of  information in respect of point Nos. 1 to 3 to the Appellant citing exemption under  sections   8(1)(e),   (g)   &   (h)   of   the   RTI   Act.   As   for   point   no.   4   i.e.   copy   of  advertisement/report,   if   any,   advertise   by   M.   Tech   Developer   regarding   bail  application filed by it before High Court, the CPIO advised the Appellant to obtain  this information from M. Tech Developers. 
4. Aggrieved by the reply of the CPIO, the Appellant filed an appeal (copy not  enclosed   with   the   present   appeal)   before   the   Appellate   Authority   which   the  Appellate   Authority   decided   vide   his   order   dated   04.09.2012.   The   Appellate  Authority through this order provided the information related to point No. 1 of the  RTI application i.e. total number of complaints received in case FIR NO. 160/09 to  the Appellant. As for point no. 2, i.e. name and addresses of complainants along  with their telephone numbers, the Appellate Authority upheld the CPIO's view that  this information sought in said points attracts exemption under sections 8(1) (e), (g)  & (h) of the RTI Act. As for point Nos. 3 & 4, the Appellate Authority advised the  Appellant to approach the concerned court/organization as it was not available in  EOW.
5. Aggrieved   by   the  order   of   the   Appellate   Authority,   the   Appellant  filed   the  present appeal before the Commission. 

Decision:

2
6. During the hearing, the Respondents inform the Commission that the case  FIR   No.   160/09   u/s   420/120B   IPC   PS   EOW   (mentioned   in   the   Appellant's   RTI  application)   was   registered   on   01.08.2009   on   the   complaint   of   Sh.   Capt.   V.K.  Sharma   (Retd.)   and   the   investigation   was   taken   up.   During   investigation,   the  several complaints (numbers of which has at present reached 745) from investors  have   been   received   against   the   said   alleged   company.   All   the   complaints   have  been clubbed with the present case. At present, the matter is under consideration  of Delhi High Court and that a nodal officer has been appointed by the court for  looking  into the  aspect  of refund  to  the  investors. The  process  of  refund to the  investors   has   already   been   initiated   by   the   court   and   list   of   all  investors/complainants has been submitted to the nodal officer appointed by the  court.   However,   investigation   of   the  case  is  still  in  progress  against   the   alleged  company M Tech Developers Ltd. They also mention that the Appellant is one of  the complainants in the present case. The Appellant, on his part, while alleging that  the said company has cheated on several people including him, desires to receive  the requisite information.  
7. Since the investigation has not yet been completed in the present matter, no  further information can be allowed to be disclosed to the Appellant at this stage. 

The   CPIO   is,   however,   directed   to   provide   the   progress   of   investigation   being  carried out in the present case to the Appellant within 1 week of receipt of this  order.

8. Appeal is disposed of with the above directions.

CIC/SS/A/2012/003652 Page 3 of 5 4   (Sushma Singh) Information Commissioner 4 Authenticated by (D.C. Singh) Deputy Registrar Address to the parties:

1. Shri Amarjeetpal Singh B­7/74, Safdurjung Enclave Extn.

New Delhi 110029

2. The Central Public Information Officer (RTI) & Assistant Commissioner of Police   Economic Offences Wing Crime Branch Mandir Marg Police Stations Complex New Delhi 

3. The Appellate Authority (RTI) & Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police  Economic Offences Wing Crime Branch Mandir Marg Police Stations Complex New Delhi CIC/SS/A/2012/003652 Page 5 of 5