Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Dr.Jordan Manasha Christoper vs State Of Gujarat on 13 March, 2018

Author: K.M.Thaker

Bench: K.M.Thaker

        C/SCA/18923/2015                                                 ORDER



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18923 of 2015

==========================================================
                   DR.JORDAN MANASHA CHRISTOPER
                               Versus
                         STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NK MAJMUDAR(430) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(11) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3,4
MR NIRAJ ASHAR, AGP (1) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,3
MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 4
NOTICE SERVED BY DS(5) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2,3,4
==========================================================

 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER

                                Date : 13/03/2018

                                  ORAL ORDER

1. Heard   Mr.Sonar,   learned   advocate   for  Mr.Majmudar, learned advocate for the petitioner,  Mr.Ashar,   learned   AGP   for   respondent   No.1   &   2  State as well as Mr.Munshaw, learned advocate for  respondent No.4. 

2. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed,  inter alia, that: 

"7(B) Be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction  and be pleased  to direct the respondent  authorities to  pass   appropriate   order   for   granting   /   disbursing   the  benefits   of   higher   pay   scale   to   the   petitioner   as   per  Government   Resolution   dated   17.10.1994   and   other  connected Government Resolutions and be pleased to issue  directions   upon   the   respondent   authorities   to   grant   /  disburse   the   benefit   of   higher   pay   scales   to   the  petitioner,   as   petitioner   has   already   completed  prescribed   period   of   services   as   per   the   Government  Page 1 of 8 C/SCA/18923/2015 ORDER Resolution dated 17.10.1994, and difference of salary be  ordered to be paid to the petitioner with 12% interest  and   retirement   dues,   pension   be   revised   after   granting  benefit of higher pay scale and difference of retirement  dues,   pension   and   other   consequential   benefits   be  ordered to be paid with 12% interest to the petitioner;
ALTERNATIVELY (B) Be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction  and   be   pleased   to   direct   the   concerned   respondent  authorities to consider and decide the application dated  01.05.2015, as expeditiously as possible;"

3. So as to support and justify the the relief  prayed for by the petitioner, the petitioner has  averred and stated that: 

"3.1) The   petitioner   states   that,   petitioner   came   to   be  appointed   as   Medical   Officer,   Class­III   by   order   dated  23.11.1970   and   she   was   promoted   as   Medical   Officer   Class   by  order dated 02.11.1979. The petitioner has attained the age of  superannuation on 31.12.2001. 
3.2) The   petitioner   states   that,   petitioner   had   served  continuously, uninterruptedly and without there being any break  and has remained in one particular cadre and in one particular  scale   all   throughout,   as   in   Ayurved   Department   or   under  respondent   no.3   there   were   hardly   promotional   avenues   made  available   for   Medical.   Officers   serving   in   various   Health  Centers,   Public   Heath   Centers,   Dispensaries   Paramedical  Centers,  Community  Health   Centers,  etc.  The  petitioner  states  that,   as   Medical   Officers   were   not   having   enough   promotional  avenues,   to   provide   advancement   opportunities   for   Medical  Officers, Class the State of Gujarat was pleased to accept the  recommendations   made   by   Tiku   Pay   Commission   and   ultimately  Government   Resolution   dated   17.10.1994   came   to   be   published  which provides for grant of higher pay scales in lieu of actual  promotions to the Medical Officers.
3.3) The petitioner states that, even by Resolution Circular  dated   01.01.   1999   the   Insurance   Medical   Officers   Medical  Officers   serving   under   Employees   State   Insurance  Scheme   were  also granted extended the benefits of higher pay scales on the  basis of the Resolution dated 17.10.1994. 
3.4) The   petitioner   states   that,   as   similarly   situated  Medical Officers who were having qualification of Ayurved i.e.  B.S.A. M. or B. A.M.S. they have not granted  the benefits  of  higher   pay   scale,   ultimately,   petitions   came   to   be   preferred  before the Hon'ble High Court by one Association representing  its   members   who   were   Medical   Officers   serving   in   State   of  Gujarat with Non M.B.B.S. degrees. The petitioner states that,  in   fact,   even   other   similarly   situated   Medical   Officers   with  Ayurved   degrees   have   also   preferred   petitions   before   the   Hon  ble   High   Court,   wherein   the   Hon'ble   Single   Judge   (Coram: 
Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S. Jhaveri) was pleased to pass an order  dated   26.07.2012   by   which   the   group   of   petitions   came   to   be  allowed   and   directions   came   to   be   issued   upon   the   Government  Page 2 of 8 C/SCA/18923/2015 ORDER authorities   for   granting   /   disbursing   benefits   of   higher   pay  scales to the incumbents having Non M.B.B.S. degrees including  the   Medical   officers   who   had   already   attended   the   age   of  superannuation.   Copy   of   order   dated   26.07.2012   passed   by   the  Hon'ble   Single   Judge   is   annexed   herewith   and   marked   as  ANNEXURE­A to this Petition. 
3.5)   The   petitioner   states   that,   the   State   of   Gujarat   had  preferred   Letters   Patent   Appeal   No.295   of   2013   and   other  connected appeals before the Hon'ble Division Bench, and by an  order   dated   17.01.2014   the   Hon'ble   Division   Bench   of   the  Hon'ble   Gujarat   High   Court   (Coram:   Hon'ble   the   Chief   Justice  Mr.   Bhaskar   Bhattacharya   and   Hon'ble   Mr.   Justice   J.   B.  Pardiwala) was pleased to reject the said Letters Patent Appeal  preferred by the Government of Gujarat confirming the judgment  of the Learned Single Judge by which the benefit was ordered to  be   extended   to   the   Medical   Officers   having   Ayurved   degrees. 

Copy of order dated 17.01.2014 passed by the Hon'ble Division  Bench   in   Letters   Patent   Appeal   No.   295   of   2013   and   other  connected appeals is annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE­B  to this Petition. 

3.6) The   petitioner   states   that,   against   the   aforesaid  judgment and order of the Hon'ble Division Bench of the Hon'ble  High   Court   of   Gujarat   confirming   the   order   passed   by   the  Hon'ble   single   Judge,   the   State   of   Gujarat   has   preferred  Special   Leave   to   Appeal   I   No   8635­8639   of   2014   before   the  Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. That by order dated 08.09.2014  the Hon'ble Supreme Court was pleased to pass an order granting  leave   in   the   aforementioned   group   of   Special   Leave   Petitions  and was pleased to direct the Government authorities to pay 50%  amount of the higher pay scale within two months from the date  of the order. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India was thereafter  pleased to grant further extension of 3 months to the State of  Gujarat. Copy of order dated 08.09.2014 passed by the Hon'ble  Supreme Court of India in Special Leave to Appeal I No. 8635­ 8639   of   2014   is   annexed   herewith   an   marked   as   ANNEXURE­C   to  this Petition. 

3.6) The   petitioner   states   that,   in   fact,   as   per   the  principle of law laid down by the Hon'ble Courts, there is no  distinction between Medical officers having M.B.B.S degrees and  Medical   Officers   having   Non­M.B.B.S   degrees,   even   Medical  Officers   having   M.B.B.S.   degrees   or   having   Post   Graduate  degrees   are   also   granted   higher   pay   scale   on   completion   of  prescribed period of services. 

3.8) The   petitioner   states   that,   one   communication   dated  21.01.2015   has   been   issued.   Copy   of   communication   dated  21.01.2015 is annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE­D to this  Petition. The petitioner states that due to non availability of  confidential   report   of   the   petitioner   for   a   period   mentioned  therein, the petitioner was not granted the benefits of higher  pay scales, however, after issuance of the said communication,  the   confidential   report   record   for   the   period   mentioned   in  Column   no.6   have   already   been   submitted   and   compliance   is  already been made, as confidential report came to be received  by the petitioner from the concerned officers duly signed and  petitioner had already handed over the same to the  Government  authorities to enable the Government authorities to pass orders  for  higher  pay  scale.  The  petitioner  states   that in  the  said  communication alongwith the name of the petitioner one another  Medical   Office   viz.   Shri   D.B.   Vyas   who   was   also   not   granted  benefit of higher pay scales on the ground of non receipt of  confidential   reports,   however,   thereafter   he   had   already  obtained the confidential report and submitted the same and he  has   also   been   granted   the   benefits   of   higher   pay   scales,  Page 3 of 8 C/SCA/18923/2015 ORDER however, petitioner has not been granted the same. Copy of the  order   dated   26.08.2015   by   which   other   similarly   situated  Medical Officer including Shri D.B. Vyas came to be granted the  benefits of higher pay scale whose name appears at serial no 42  is annexed herewith and marke as ANNEXURE­E to this Petition."

4. From the details mentioned by the petitioner,  it   has   emerged   that   the   petitioner   was   serving  with   the   respondent   as   Medical   Officer   (Class­ III). The petitioner sought voluntary retirement.  The   request   was   accepted.   Consequently,   the  petitioner   retired   from   service,   on   voluntary  retirement, on 31.12.2001.

5. In   this   backdrop,   the   petitioner   felt  aggrieved on the ground that the respondents have  not considered her case for higher pay scale and  the   said   benefit   is   not   granted   to   the  petitioner.  

6. It appears that the delay or discrepancy has  occurred   in   view   of   the   fact   that   at   the   time  when the petitioner sought voluntary retirement,  her   case   was   under   consideration   for   promotion.  By the time, the competent authority could decide  the petitioner's case for promotion, she tendered  Page 4 of 8 C/SCA/18923/2015 ORDER application for voluntary retirement. 

7. On the other hand, the petitioner claims that  her claim is delayed in view of the fact that the  respondents   informed   the   petitioner   that  confidential reports for relevant periods are not  available. 

8. Be  that  as  it  may,  it  has  emerged  from  the  record that almost 14 years after the petitioner  retired, on voluntary retirement, the petitioner  submitted   an   application   /   representation   and  demanded benefit of higher pay scale. 

9. It has also emerged that the said application  / representation is pending before the competent  authority   and   any   final   decision,   either  accepting request or rejecting the demand, is yet  not taken by the competent authority.  

10. In this background, it would not be possible,  in present proceedings, to decide, at this stage,  as   to   whether   the   petitioner   is   entitled   for  benefit   of   higher   pay   scale   or   not.   The   said  Page 5 of 8 C/SCA/18923/2015 ORDER decision   depends   on   various   aspects   including  confidential reports for relevant period.  

11. Under  the  circumstances,   it appears  that   it  would   be   appropriate,   at   this   stage,   to   accept  the   petitioner's   request   in   paragraph   No.7(B)  (alternative), i.e. to direct the respondents to  decide   the   petitioner's   application   /  representation dated 1.5.2015 expeditiously.  

12. In   this   view   of   the   matter,   the   following  order is passed.

13. The   competent   authority   of   the   respondents  shall   take   up   the   petitioner's   application   /  representation   dated   1.5.2015   for   appropriate  order.  

13.1   The   competent   authority   shall   consider   the  said application / representation in light of the  facts of the case and in light of the applicable  rules and policy and take appropriate decision as  expeditiously   as   possible,   but   not   later   than  30.4.2018.  

Page 6 of 8 C/SCA/18923/2015 ORDER 13.2   The authority shall convey the decision to  the petitioner.  

13.3   If the authority holds that the petitioner  is   entitled   to   the   said   benefit,   then   the  authority will take necessary steps to re­fix the  salary   of   the   petitioner   and   pay   the   amount   /  arrears   to   the   petitioner   as   expeditiously   as  possible and preferably within three months after  the   decision   in   respect   of   the   petitioner's  application / representation dated 1.5.2015.  13.4   However,   if   the   authority   holds   that   the  petitioner is not entitled for the said benefit,  then   the   authority   shall   pass   a   speaking   and  reasoned   order   on   or   before   30.4.2018   and   said  reasoned   decision   shall   be   conveyed   to   the  petitioner. 

13.5   It   is   clarified   that   the   disposal   of   the  petition   with   the   aforesaid   clarification   and  direction   shall   not   stand   in   way   of   the  petitioner   if   the   petitioner   feels   aggrieved   by  Page 7 of 8 C/SCA/18923/2015 ORDER the   decision   of   the   competent   authority   in  respect of the application / representation dated  1.5.2015 and it would be open to the petitioner  to   follow   such   course   of   action,   against   such  decision,   as   the   petitioner   considers  appropriate. 

With   the   aforesaid   clarifications   and  directions, the petition is disposed of.   Orders  accordingly. 

(K.M.THAKER, J) Bharat Page 8 of 8