Allahabad High Court
Puja Suri vs Bijoy Suri on 19 April, 2016
Author: Pramod Kumar Srivastava
Bench: Pramod Kumar Srivastava
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 19 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 258 of 2012 Appellant :- Puja Suri Respondent :- Bijoy Suri Counsel for Appellant :- Vivek Kumar Birla,Shishir Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Kr. Srivastava,M.K.Gupta Hon'ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Appellant side requests for adjournment.
Learned counsel for the respondent informs that in trial court matrimonial petition of divorce of plaintiff/respondent was decreed and divorce was granted to the plaintiff. Thereafter, first appeal was dismissed. Against the judgments of trial court and first appellate court, present second appeal was preferred, which was dismissed in default on 17th December, 2012. After that respondent had remarried and had one issue from his second marriage performed before restoration of second appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant informs that correction application 44440 of 2013 has been filed on behalf of respondent mentioning these facts.
These points relating to the facts mentioned in correction application and also the averments of counsel for the appellant that respondent has performed second marriage within 30 days of dismissal of appeal shall be heard and considered at the time of final hearing of this matter, and for that no miscellaneous application is further required to be considered.
List this case on 09th May, 2016 as unlisted.
Order Date :- 19.4.2016 Sanjeev