Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Dharmapal M.A., L.L.B vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 April, 2013

Bench: Chief Justice, B.V.Nagarathna

                           1

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

         DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2013

                       PRESENT

      THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE

                          AND

       THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA

        WRIT PETITION NO.18819/2013 (GM-RES-PIL)

BETWEEN

1.     SRI DHARMAPAL M.A., L.L.B
       ADVOCATE
       S/O MARIAPPA GOWDA
       AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, NO.64/1
       LAKSHMI COMMERCIAL COMPLEX
       SESHADRIPURAM 1ST MAIN ROAD
       BANGALORE-560020

2.     MR. LEELESH KUMR K.P.
       ADVOCATE
       S/O LATE K.A. POOVAIAH
       AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
       R/AT NO.539, 8TH CROSS
       GOKUL, YESHWANTHPURA
       BANGALORE-560022

3.     MR. DEVANANDA H.L.
       ADVOCATE
       S/O LATE H.LINGAPPA
       AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, NO.64
       LAKSHMI COMMERCIAL COMPLEX
       SESHADRIPURAM 1ST MAIN
       BANGALORE-560020

4.     MR. NARAYANA SHETTY .K
       S/O LATE K.K. SHETTY
       AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
       SOCIAL WORKER
       R/AT 27, 2ND CROSS
                           2

      DEVAPPA GARDEN, 1ST MAIN
      R.M.V. 2ND STAGE
      BANGALORE-560094

5.    DR. BENSON
      S/O LATE K.G. KURIAN
      AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
      R/AT 619, MANAE COMPOUND
      T. DASARAHALLI
      BANGALORE-560057                  ... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI K.L.SHREENEVASA & SRI MOHAMMED RIZWAN
 AHAMED, ADVS., FOR M/S. K N L ASSOCIATES, ADVS.,)

AND

1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
      REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
      VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001

2.    THE STATE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER
      OFFICE OF ELECTION COMMISSIONER
      CUBBAN PARK, BANGALORE-560001

3.    THE COMMISSIONER OF B.B.M.P.
      BANGALORE CITY CORPORATION
      BANGALORE-560001

4.    THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
      OF KARNATAKA STATE
      NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
      BANGALORE-560001

5.    THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
      OF BANGALORE CITY, INFANTRY ROAD
      BANGALORE-560001

6.    THE CHAIRMAN
      KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION
      CONTROL BOARD, M.S. BUILDINGS
      BANGALORE-560001
                                   ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI R.DEVDAS, AGA FOR R-1, 4 & 5;
 SRI D.NAGARAJ, ADV., FOR R-6)
                              3

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA PRAYING
TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CURB AND BAN
COMPLETELY MANUFACTURING, SELLING AND USING
OF NATIONAL FLAGS, BANNERS, BUNTINGS FLEX,
HOARDINGS OR ANY KIND OF FLAGS, CAPS AND ANY
OTHER ITEMS MADE OUT OF PLASTIC DURING TIME OF
ELECTION CAMPAIGN AND NATIONAL FESTIVALS AND
ETC.,

    THIS   WRIT  PETITION COMING   ON  FOR
PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE
MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

D.H.WAGHELA, CJ (Oral)

1. In spite of the petition having been filed by five petitioners, few of whom are advocates, learned counsel for the petitioners only canvassed the necessity of curbing and banning completely manufacturing, selling and using of national flags, banners, buntings flex, hoardings or any kind of flags, caps and any other items made out of plastic during the time of election campaign and national festivals.

2. No reply was forthcoming to the question regarding the relevant legal provisions, on the basis of which any relief, as prayed, could be granted. This shows the level at which litigations are filed and pursued in the name of public interest. It appears from the record that, there are rules for management and handling of plastic waste and 4 authorities are prescribed therein. Accordingly, the use, collection, segregation, transportation and disposal of plastic waste is regulated by the rules and there are authorities entrusted with the task of enforcement of these rules. The petitioners do not appear to have cared to even find out the officers entrusted with enforcement of the above rules and approach them with appropriate representation. Under the circumstances and in absence of any legal assistance in the matter, it would be inappropriate to issue notice to the respondents on the basis of vague allegations and in the absence of specific averments made in the petition. Therefore, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority, after necessary study of the appropriate legal provisions.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/ -

JUDGE bkv