Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mrdevendra Sharma vs Gnctd on 8 December, 2014

                                                            

                 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                   (Room No.315, B­Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066)



                         File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000345




     Appellant                                      :          Sh. Devender Sharma



     Respondent                          :          Delhi Cooperative Housing 
                                                    Finance Corporation, New Delhi


     Date of hearing                                :          01­12­2014


     Date of decision                               :          08­12­2014


      Information Commissioner :                    Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu
                                                               (Madabhushi Sridhar)

     Referred Sections                               :         Sections 19(3) of the RTI Act


     Result                              :          Appeal  allowed/
                                                    Disposed of




     The Appellant is not present.   The Public Authority is represented by Mr. S.K.Kaushik, 

   Delhi Cooperative Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. New Delhi. 



   FACTS:

2.   The Appellant through his RTI application dated 01.08.2013 had sought for information on  9 Points Viz i) As per the terms of the loan agreement the society was requred to submit to  CIC/SA/A/2014/000345 Page 1 DCHFC - Site plan, Project report, lay out plan, Building plan.. from DDA to mortgage the  land   taken   from   them   for   lease   ii)   Copy   of   the   resolution   dated   31.05.87   passed   in   the  General Body meeting of the society submitted to DCHFC, iv) As per the loan agreement  society   was   to   furnish   the   evidence   to  the   effect   that   the   society   has   collected   from   its  members amount equivalnet to the difference between the total cost of the project and the  sanctioned  loan  amount   and  invested  the  same  in  the  scheme.   Provide  the  copy   of   the  evidence   submitted   by   the   Society.   PIO   replied   on   30.08.2013   giving   him   point   wise  information.   Being unsatsified with the information furnished, the appelllant Preferred First  Appeal.     FAA   by   his   Order   dated   31.10.2013   upheld   the   information   furnished   by   PIO.  Claiming non­satisfaction with the information furnished, the appellant has approached the  Commission in Second Appeal.

DECISION

3.    The appellant is not present.  The Respondent authority made their submissions.   The  respondent/PIO submitted that all the information was furnished to the appellant and the FAA  order was complied with.  A copy of the information is presented to the Commission during  hearing.   As the appellant has received the required information,   the Commission closes  the appeal. 





                                                                                           (M. Sridhar Acharyulu)
                                                                                       Information Commissioner

Authenticated true copy 




  (Babu Lal)

CIC/SA/A/2014/000345                               Page 2
           Deputy Registrar




Address of the parties:

         1. The CPIO under RTI, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi Cooperative Housing Finance Corporation Limited, 3/6 Siri Fort Institutional Area, August Kranti Marg, New Delhi­110049

2. Shri Devender Sharma Flat No.89, NeelkamalApartment, H­Block Vikaspuri, New Delhi­110018 CIC/SA/A/2014/000345 Page 3