Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Gujarat Enviro Protection And ... vs Union Of India & 3 on 9 March, 2016

Author: R.M.Chhaya

Bench: R.M.Chhaya

                   C/SCA/10573/2015                                              ORDER



                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                   SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION  NO. 10573 of 2015

         ==========================================================
               GUJARAT ENVIRO PROTECTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD  & 
                                1....Petitioner(s)
                                      Versus
                      UNION OF INDIA  &  3....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR   KAMAL   TRIVEDI,   SR.   ADVOCATE   with   MR   RAKESH   GUPTA, 
         ADVOCATE   with   MR.   ABHISHEK   M.MEHTA,   ADVOCATE   for   M/S 
         TRIVEDI & GUPTA, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s)No.1­2
         MR DEVANG VYAS, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         MS TRUSHA K PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No.1­2
         NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 4
         ==========================================================

             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
          
                                      Date : 09/03/2016
          
                                         ORAL ORDER

1. Heard   Mr.Kamal   B.   Trivedi,   learned   senior  advocate with Mr. Rakesh Gupta, learned advocate  with Mr. Abhishek M. Mehta, learned advocate for  the   petitioners   and   Ms.   Trusha   Patel,   learned  Central Government counsel for respondents no.1,  2 and 3.

2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the  Constitution   of   India,   the   petitioners   have  prayed for the following reliefs ­ "13. (A) Your   Lordships   may   be   pleased   to  issue   a   writ   of   mandamus   and/or   a   writ   in  the   nature   of   mandamus   or   a   writ   of   certiorari   and/or   a   writ   in   the   nature   of  certiorari   or   any   other   appropriate   writ,  order   or   direction   quashing   and   setting  aside   the   notice   to   show   cause   dated  24.04.2015  provisional   attachment   order  Page 1 of 7 HC-NIC Page 1 of 7 Created On Mon Mar 14 01:12:29 IST 2016 C/SCA/10573/2015 ORDER dated   27.03.2015   as   well   as   the   impugned  complaint   dated   21.04.2015   as   well   as   the  order   dated   23.06.2015   passed   by   the  Respondent no. 3 adjudicating authority; 

(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue  a   writ   of   mandamus   and/or   a   writ   in   the   nature of mandamus or a writ  of certiorari  and/or a writ in the nature of certiorari or   any   other   appropriate   writ,   order   or  direction,  declaring   that   the  conduct/procedure   adopted   by   the   respondent  No.3   adjudicating   authority   in   (a)   orally  refusing   to   decide   the   preliminary  objections/contentions   regarding   lack   of  jurisdiction   of   the   respondent   No.3  adjudicating   authority   as   raised   by   the  petitioners and directing the petitioners to   proceed   on   merits   without   deciding,   the  preliminary   objections/contentions  regarding   jurisdiction   of   the   respondent  No.3 adjudicating authority and (b) refusing  to   direct   the   respondent   No.2   to   place   on  record the entire material collected during  the course of investigation (c), refusing to   grant   cross   examination   of   the   officers   of   the   ED,   transporters   and   the   competent  officers   of   the   recipients   of   the   material   supplied   by   the   petitioners   who   were  examined   by   the   ED   during   the   course   of  investigation, as being grossly violative of   principles   of   natural   justice,   causing  prejudice   to   the   petitioners   and   being   a  procedure which is contrary to law  and hit  by   vice   of   arbitrariness   and   without  application of mind and a procedure which is   vitiated in law and the same deserves to be  quashed and set aside.

(C)   Pending   admission,   hearing   and   final  disposal of present petition, Your Lordships   may be pleased to direct, by way of interim  relief,   staying   the   further   proceedings   of  complaint   0C   No.453/2015   including   show  cause notice dated 24.4.2015, pending before  the respondent No.3 adjudicating authority; 

Page 2 of 7

HC-NIC Page 2 of 7 Created On Mon Mar 14 01:12:29 IST 2016 C/SCA/10573/2015 ORDER (D) Pending   admission,   hearing   and   final  disposal of present petition, Your Lordships   may be pleased to direct, by way of interim  relief   that   the   Respondent   no.   3   may   not  proceed   with   the   further   hearing   of   the  complaint   OC   no.   453/2015   till   (i)   the  respondent   no.   3   adjudicating   authority   is  properly constituted in accordance with the  provisions of  the PML Act, (ii)  the entire  material   collected   during   the   course   of  investigation is provided to the petitioners 

(iii) the cross examination of the concerned   officers/parties   as   prayed   for   by   the   Petitioners is granted; 

(E) Your Lordships may be pleased to grant  ad interim relief in terms of para 13(C) and   13(D) above;

(F) Any   other   and   further   relief/s   as   may  be deemed just and proper in the facts and  circumstances of the present case may kindly   be granted."

3. As far as contentions raised in the petition are  concerned,   the   learned   senior   counsel   appearing  for the petitioners asserts that main and primary  contention   was   that   the   authority   was   not  properly   constituted.     It   deserves   to   be   noted  that this Court had passed the following order on  01.07.2015 ­  "Heard   learned   senior   counsel   Mr.K.B.  Trivedi.

2.  The   Adjudicating   Authority   under   the  Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is  seized of the matter of the petitioner, in  the process of adjudication under Section 8  of   the   Act   to   confirm   the   order   of   provisional   attachment   passed   under   Section  5   by   the   authority   below.   In   the   said   proceedings,   petitioner   wanted   right   to  Page 3 of 7 HC-NIC Page 3 of 7 Created On Mon Mar 14 01:12:29 IST 2016 C/SCA/10573/2015 ORDER cross­examination   and   further   wanted   copies  of certain documents. The request of cross­ examination   is   refused   by   the   Adjudicating  Authority on the ground that the stage under   Section 8(6) has not reached and therefore,  question   of   cross­examination   of   the  witnesses   does   not   arise.   It   has   also  refused the request for supply of documents  for the reasons stated in the order­cum­note   on proceedings dated 23rd June, 2015. It was  submitted that adjudication under Section 8  is a  quasi judicial  proceedings.  The matter  is   stated   to   be   posted   next   on   03rd  July,  2015. 

3.  While   the   aforesaid   facts   emerged   from  the record, considering the submission that  the   Adjudicating   Authority   is   not   duly  constituted under sub­section (2) of Section   6   of   the   Act   and   it   has   been   functioning  with   only   one   Executive   Member,   therefore  suffering   from   infirmity   of   coram   non   judice,  further   considering   the   fact   that  similar   contention   about   constitution   of  Adjudicating Authority was raised in Special  Civil   Application   No.13949   of   2014   and  entertained for notice, let there be  Notice   in   this   matter,   returnable   on  09th  July,   2015.

4.  Till   the   next   date   the   Adjudicating  Authority is directed not to pass any orders   and shall adjourn the proceedings.

5. Direct service is permitted." 

Further, on 17.12.2015, this Court had passed the  following order ­ "At the joint request of learned counsel for  the respective parties, S.O to 27th January,   2016. Ad­interim relief granted  earlier, to  continue till the next date of hearing. 

Page 4 of 7

HC-NIC Page 4 of 7 Created On Mon Mar 14 01:12:29 IST 2016 C/SCA/10573/2015 ORDER At   the   request   of   Ms.Trusha   K.   Patel,  learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3,  it   needs   to   be   clarified   that   this   Court  vide order dated 01.07.2015 granted interim  relief, which is as under:­ "Till   the   next   date,   the   Adjudicating  Authority   is   directed   not   to   pass   any  orders   and   shall   adjourn   the  proceedings." 

The   aforesaid   order   is   continued   till   date   and hence,  it is  clarified that  the period  during   which   such   ad­interim   relief   shall  remain   in   operation,   such   period   shall   be  excluded while reckoning 180 days." 

4. In response to the notice issued by this Court,  the respondent authority has also dealt with the  merits of the matter.  However, by an additional  affidavit   dated   25.01.2016,   the   respondent   no.2  through   the   Assistant   Director,   has   made  following statement in paras 2 and 3 of the said  affidavit ­ "2. The   respondents   have   already   filed   an  affidavit   in   reply   in   the   above   referred  matter   wherein   the   appointment   of   judicial  member Shri G.C. Mishra in the Adjudicating  Authority,   PMLA   was   pointed   out.     However,   with   a   view   to   bring   the   subsequent  development   on   record,   the   deponent   files   present affidavit.

3. It   is   respectfully   submitted   that   the  Government   of   India   vide   order   dated  07.01.2016   appointed   Shri   Tushar   V   Shah,  Advocate as Member from the field of law in  the   Adjudicating   Authority.     In   addition,  the   Government   of   India   has   also   appointed   Shri   Devendra   Singhai,   Retd.   IAS   as   Member   from   the   field   of   administration   in   the  Adjudicating Authority.  Annexed here to and   Page 5 of 7 HC-NIC Page 5 of 7 Created On Mon Mar 14 01:12:29 IST 2016 C/SCA/10573/2015 ORDER marked   Annexure:   A­1   (colly)   are   copies   of   the   respective   orders   dated   07.01.2016  issued   from   F.No.   A­12026/1/2013­SO   (ES  Cell)   and   F.No.A­12026/2/2015­SO   (ES   Cell)  by   the   Department   of   Revenue,   Ministry   of  Finance."

5. Mr.Kamal   B.   Trivedi,   learned   senior   advocate  appearing   for   the   petitioners   submitted   that   in  view of the said statement, the proceedings which  are pending before the adjudicating authority be  directed to be in accordance with law. However,  Mr.Trivedi, learned senior counsel, has drawn the  attention of this court to the prayers which are  prayed in para 13(B) of the petition.  

6. In   view   of   the   aforesaid   statement   made   in   the  affidavit­in­reply   filed   by   the   concerned  respondent,   the   present   petition   is   disposed   of  and   the   learned   authority,   respondent   no.3  herein, shall give opportunity of being heard to  the petitioners and pass appropriate orders.   It  goes   without   saying   that   the   learned   authority,  respondent no.3 herein, shall follow Adjudicating  Authority   (Procedure)   Regulations,   2013   and  consider the prayers which are prayed for in para  13  (B).     The  authority  shall   also  give  copy  of  the reply that is filed by the complainant.   It  is   however   clarified   that   this   Court   has   not  expressed any opinion on the other issues which  are pending before the adjudicating authority and  the authority shall decide the same in accordance  with  law.    As  far  as  order  dated  17.12.2015  is  Page 6 of 7 HC-NIC Page 6 of 7 Created On Mon Mar 14 01:12:29 IST 2016 C/SCA/10573/2015 ORDER concerned, the time taken before this Court shall  not be taken into reckoning 180 days, as pointed  out   by   Ms.Patel,   learned   Central   Government  counsel, that the provisional attachment order is  dated 27.03.2015.     The petition stands disposed  of   accordingly.     Notice   discharged.     Ad­interim  relief stands vacated.

(R.M.CHHAYA, J.)  bjoy Page 7 of 7 HC-NIC Page 7 of 7 Created On Mon Mar 14 01:12:29 IST 2016