Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court

Sri Sudipta Bhattacharjee & Anr vs Smt. Chandrima Chatterjee & Ors on 17 February, 2014

Author: Samapti Chatterjee

Bench: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, Samapti Chatterjee

ORDER SHEET
                          GA No.161 of 2014
                         APOT No.29 of 2014
                          WP No.571 of 2013
                  IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                      Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
                            ORIGINAL SIDE

                                  SRI SUDIPTA BHATTACHARJEE & ANR.
                                                            Versus
                                 SMT. CHANDRIMA CHATTERJEE & ORS.

 BEFORE:
 The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY
            AND
 The Hon'ble JUSTICE SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE
 Date: 17th February, 2014
                                                      Mr. B. B. Sarkar, Adv. with
                                                               Ms. Iti Dutta, , Adv.
                                                         Mr. Arup Chatterjee, Adv.
                                                                Ms. Priti Jain, Adv.
                                                                 ..for the appellant
                                                       Mr. Biswanath Mitra, Adv.
                                                      ..for the private respondent

Mr. Pranab Kumar Dutta, Adv. with Ms. Piyali Sengupta, Adv.

..for the KMC Having heard learned Advocate of the respective parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that during pendency of the review application, Kolkata Municipal Corporation Authority should not be asked to take necessary steps for mutation and separation of the premises in question.

In the aforesaid circumstances, we grant liberty to the parties herein to take necessary steps before the City Civil Court at Calcutta for expediting the disposal of the pending review application. 2

Further hearing of this application stands adjourned till 24th March, 2014.

Let there also be an interim order staying of operation of the impugned judgment and order under appeal passed by the learned Single Judge until further orders.

All parties are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings.

(PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.) (SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE, J.) AKGoswami