Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

M/S.Varanasi Glass Indistries vs Central Coalfields Ltd. & Ors on 1 August, 2012

Author: Narendra Nath Tiwari

Bench: Narendra Nath Tiwari

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

                          W.P.(C) No.472 of 2011

           M/s. Varanasi Glass Industries                                    .... Petitioner
                                        Versus
           M/s. CCL & Ors.                                                   ...Respondents

           Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari

           For the Petitioner         : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate
           For the Respondents         : Mr. A.K.Mehta, Advocate
                                    -----

3/01.08.2012

According to the petitioner, it is entitled to refund 20% of the amount deposited as increased basic price i.e. in excess of the notified price of the linked quantity of coal for the period from January, 2007 to April,2008 in the light of the order of the Supreme Court passed in 'Ashoka Smokeless' case[(2007)2 SCC 640] and the order of the Patna High Court.

It has been stated that the respondents had charged 20% excess amount for the notified price illegally and they are liable to refund a sum of Rs.39,47,592.92. The petitioner filed representation before the General Manager (Sales & Marketing), CCL, Ranchi-respondent no.3 as far back as on 10.11.2010, but till date, no order has been passed.

Mr. A.K.Mehta, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents, submitted that if the petitioner's application is still pending, the same shall be considered and appropriate order shall be passed without further delay.

Considering the said submissions, this writ petition is disposed of directing the General Manager (Sales & Marketing), CCL, Ranchi-respondent no.3 to consider the petitioner's application and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) s.b.