Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

M/S Parle Products Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 December, 2018

Bench: Chief Justice, G R Moolchandani

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

        D.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 465/2018

M/s Parle Products Pvt. Ltd., (Incorporated Under The Companies
Act, 1956) Having Its Registered Office At North Level Crossing,
Ville Parle, Mumbai- 400057 And Factory At E-7-A And E-8
RICCO Industrial Area, Nimerana, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar
(Rajasthan) Through Its Managing Director Shri Mahaveer Sahu
S/o Shri Jhanwarmal Sahu, Aged About 47 Years, R/o B-72,
Bhan Nagar, Vaishali, Jaipur (Raj.) At Present Residing House No.
277-278, Hanuman Nagar, Extension, Sirsi Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
                                                             ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
1.     State    Of    Rajasthan,     Through    Secretary,     Agriculture
       Produce Market Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
       Krishi Bhawan, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur.
2.     Director,     Agriculture     Produce     Market      Department,
       Government Of Rajasthan, Krishi Bhawan, Bhagwan Das
       Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
3.     Krishi   Upaj    Mandi      Samiti,   Khairthal,    District   Alwar
       Through Its Secretary.
                                                          ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raunak Bapna on behalf of Mr. Sunil Nath For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G R MOOLCHANDANI Order 18/12/2018
1. Indeed, there is a typographic error in paragraph 2 of the order dated 23.10.2018. In the last sentence of the paragraph it has been inadvertently recorded that the appellant purchased sugar from various States and brought the sugar to its factory (2 of 2) [WMAP-465/2018] premises in the State of Uttar Pradesh and consumed the sugar for manufacturing bakery products and confectionery items.
2. The error is to the reference made to the sugar being brought to the factory premises in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The correct fact is that as per the appellant it brought the sugar to its factory premises in the State of Rajasthan.
3. Thus, the application is disposed of directing that in the last sentence of paragraph 2 of the order dated 23.10.2018 reference to State of Uttar Pradesh be treated as reference to the State of Rajasthan.

(G R MOOLCHANDANI),J (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ JKP/KKC/S-163 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)