Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Pawan Rathore vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 January, 2022

Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia

Bench: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia

                          1
          THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                       MCRC No. 1928/2022
           (PAWAN RATHORE Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

                    Through Video Conferencing

Gwalior, Dated : 14/01/2022

      Shri S.S. Rajput, Counsel for applicant.

      Shri A.P.S. Tomar, Counsel for State.

      Case diary is available.

      This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for

grant of bail.

      The applicant has been arrested on 02.01.2022 in connection

with Crime No.03/2022 registered by Police Station - Cant Guna,

District Guna, for offence punishable under Sections 34 (1), 49-A of

Excise Act.

      It is submitted by Counsel for the applicant that according to the

prosecution case, 20 liters of liquor which is alleged to be unfit for

human consumption has been seized from the possession of the

applicant. It is submitted that the FSL report has not been received,

and therefore, it is not known as to whether the liquor allegedly seized

from the possession of applicant is poisonous/unfit for human

consumption or not. In view of the criminal antecedents, the applicant

is ready and willing to contribute for fighting against COVD-19

pandemic. The trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is

no possibility of his absconding or tampering with prosecution case.

      Per contra, the application is opposed by Counsel for the

respondent/State. However, it is fairly conceded that the FSL report
2

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No. 1928/2022 (PAWAN RATHORE Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) has not been received. It is further submitted that as per the criminal antecedent, one offence under the Public Gambling Act was registered against applicant.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail, in case he deposits an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rs. Five Thousand Only) in the Registry of this Court, which shall be utilized for upgrading the Civil Dispensary functioning in the Court premises and on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.

It is further clarified that after receipt of FSL report, if it is found that the liquor seized from the possession of the applicant was unfit for human consumption, then this order shall automatically lose its effect and the applicant shall be under obligation to immediately surrender before the Trial Court.

This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18/3/2021 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No. 1928/2022 (PAWAN RATHORE Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) in Criminal Appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.

Certified copy as per rule.

(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge Aman AMAN TIWARI 2022.01.14 17:12:07 +05'30'