Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court - Orders

Bhagalpur Banka Kshetriya Gramin Bankn ... vs Sunil Kumar Verma & Ors. on 13 May, 2015

Author: Ramesh Kumar Datta

Bench: Ramesh Kumar Datta

      Patna High Court C. REV. No.343 of 2012 (7) dt.13-05-2015




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                       Civil Review No.343 of 2012
                                                     In
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15664 of 2012
                   ======================================================
                   Bhagalpur Banka Kshetriya Gramin Bankn & Ors.
                                                                      .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                   Sunil Kumar Verma & Ors.
                                                                     .... .... Respondent/s
                   ======================================================

                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
                   ORAL ORDER

7   13-05-2015

As prayed for, two weeks' time is allowed to learned counsel for the petitioners to file the substitution petition with regard to opposite party Nos. 1 and 3 or an application for expunging their names at the risk of the petitioners as may be advised, failing compliance either of which the civil review application, as against them, shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench.

Two weeks' time is also allowed to learned counsel for the petitioners for taking steps for fresh service of notice on opposite party Nos.7 and 10 both under ordinary process and registered cover with A/D at their correct present address, failing which the application, as against them, shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench.

With regard to opposite party Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 6, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that fresh notices under Patna High Court C. REV. No.343 of 2012 (7) dt.13-05-2015 registered cover with A/D had been filed at their correct present address obtained upon information from the places where they were found to be working and therefore, the service of notices may be deemed to be valid.

In view of the aforesaid statements of learned counsel for the petitioners, the service of notices on opposite party Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 6 is deemed to be valid.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) V.P.Sinha/-

U