Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

Girimallappa S/O Malakappa Kallur And ... vs The State Of Karnataka & Ors on 4 June, 2013

Author: Ram Mohan Reddy

Bench: Ram Mohan Reddy

                           -1-
                                       W.P.No.86130/2012




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
           CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA

       DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013

                        BEFORE

   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY

         W.P.No.86130 OF 2012 (KLR-RR-SUR)


BETWEEN:

1. GIRIMALLAPPA
   S/O MALAKAPPA KALLUR
   AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
   OCC: AGRICULTURE
   R/O CHIKKAHAVALAGI
   TQ. SINDAGI, DIST. BIJAPUR-586101

2. GURANNA
   S/O MALAKAPPA KALLUR
   AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
   OCC: AGRICULTURE
   R/O CHIKKAHAVALAGI
   TQ. SINDAGI, DIST. BIJAPUR-586101

                                        ... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI I.R.BIRADAR, ADVOCATE)


AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
   BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPT.
   M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-1

2. THE TAHASILDAR SINDAGI
   TQ. SINDAGI, DIST. BIJAPUR-586101
                               -2-
                                                W.P.No.86130/2012




3. MAHADEVI
   W/O VITTAPPA NEVAGI
   AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
   OCC: AGRICULTURE
   R/O DEVAR-NAVADAGI
   TQ. SINDAGI
   DIST. BIJAPUR-586101

                                                ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR R. TENGLI, AGA FOR R1 & R2)


     THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND TO QUASH THE MUTATION ENTRY
DATED   7.6.2003   PASSED     BY    THE   2ND   RESPONDENT     IN
M.E.NO.3751 IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-J AND ETC.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                          ORDER

Petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy of filing an appeal under Section 136 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1966, calling in question the mutation entry in M.E.No.3751 dated 07.06.2003 Annexure-J passed by the Tahsildar, Sindagi. So also, petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy to call in question the entries made in the revenue records -3- W.P.No.86130/2012 by the Tahsildar by filing an appeal under the same provision. Accordingly, appeal is rejected.

Sd/-

JUDGE.

NB*