Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Chetan Satish Timblo vs The Union Of India on 18 March, 2024

Author: Neela Gokhale

Bench: K. R. Shriram, Neela Gokhale

          Digitally
          signed by                                        1/2                   411 to 414-oswp-1947-2023.doc
          SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH    SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN   Date:
          2024.03.19
          18:42:46
                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          +0530


                                         ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                                WRIT PETITION NO.1947 OF 2023

                         Rohan Satish Timblo                                       ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                         The Union of India & Ors.                                 ...Respondents

                                                           WITH
                                               WRIT PETITION NO.1949 OF 2023

                         Mallika Rohan Timblo                                      ...Petitioner
                               Versus
                         The Union of India & Ors.                                 ...Respondents

                                                           WITH
                                               WRIT PETITION NO.1950 OF 2023

                         Chetan Satish Timblo                                      ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                         The Union of India & Ors                                  ...Respondents

                                                           WITH
                                               WRIT PETITION NO.1951 OF 2023

                         Radha Satish Timblo                                       ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                         The Union of India & Ors.                                 ...Respondents


                         Mr. V. Chandrashekhar, with Nishit Gandhi with Ms Nikitha, for
                         Petitioners.
                         Mr. Suresh Kumar, for Respondents-Revenue.


                                                      CORAM:     K. R. SHRIRAM &
                                                                 DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
                                                      DATED:     18th March 2024
                         PC:-


1. All the Petitions have been amended pursuant to leave granted by the Court (Goa Bench) on 31st March 2023. We find that the Shivgan ::: Uploaded on - 19/03/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2024 20:15:36 ::: 2/2 411 to 414-oswp-1947-2023.doc exhibits annexed pursuant to amendment are not in red color and it is becoming difficult to make out which is the amended portion and which is the original.

2. Mr. Gandhi, advocate on record states within two weeks, he shall file additional reconstructed set clearly identifying the amended portions and also serve a copy thereof upon Mr. Suresh Kumar.

3. Mr. Suresh Kumar states by 12th April 2024, he shall file further reply to the amended portion.

4. Stand over to 23rd April 2024.

(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) Shivgan ::: Uploaded on - 19/03/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2024 20:15:36 :::