Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Mrt Signals Ltd vs The Union Of India And 2 Ors on 27 September, 2023

Author: Manish Choudhury

Bench: Manish Choudhury

                                                                                  Page No. 1/2

GAHC010065262018




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/2123/2018

            MRT SIGNALS LTD.
            2, RAJA WOODMUNT STREET, 3RD FLOOR, KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL

            VERSUS

            THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS.
            REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF
            RAILWAY, NEW DELHI

            2:N. F. RAILWAYS
             REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER
             HAVING HIS OFFICE SITUATED AT MALIGAON
             GUWAHATI.

            3:THE DY. CHIEF SIGNAL AND TELECOM ENGINEER/CONSTRUCTION
            AGARTALA AT MALIGAON
             GUWAHATI

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. S CHETIA

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NF RLY

                                    BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                           ORDER

Date : 27.09.2023 Mr. A. Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that without prejudice to the observations made in the Letter dated 10.01.2018, the petitioner wants to make an endeavour to discuss the issues raised by the respondent Railway authorities by approaching them. It is submitted by Mr. Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner that the case be listed Page No. 2/2 after 4 [four] weeks in order to enable the petitioner to approach the respondent Railway authorities and thereafter, to apprise this Court about the outcome of such approach.

Mr. B. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, N.F. Railways has not opposed to the said submission.

In view of the above submission made by Mr. Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner, list the case after 4 [four] weeks enabling the petitioner to approach the respondent Railway authorities in the meantime.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant