Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Bapi Mondal vs The Joint Secretary And Chief Passport on 15 January, 2024

D/L. 29.
January 15, 2024.
 MNS.


                                    WPA No. 27141 of 2023

                                      Bapi Mondal
                                            Vs.
                         The Joint Secretary and Chief Passport
                                    Officer and others

                       Mr. Sanjit Dutta

                                         ... for the petitioner.

                       Sk. Md. Galib,
                       Mr. Safik Dewan

                                       ...for the State.

                1. The petitioner holds a passport.              A show

                    cause          notice      was       issued        for

                    impounding/revocation of the said passport.

                    The petitioner gave reply to the proceeding in

                    terms of the show cause notice. However, till

                    date no hearing has been given to the

                    petitioner.

                2. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be kept

                    on record.

                3. Despite        service,   none    appears     for   the

                    Passport Authorities, although the State is

                    represented through counsel.

                4. WPA No. 27141 of 2023 is disposed of by

                    directing the respondent no. 2, that is, the

Regional Passport Officer, Kolkata, to give an 2 opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter to take a decision on the proposed revocation/annulment of the passport of the petitioner.

5. It is expected that such exercise will be completed at the earliest, preferably within four weeks from the date of communication of this order to the respondent no. 2.

6. Till the petitioner is heard, the passport of the petitioner shall not be revoked / impounded unless the same has already been revoked / impounded prior to this order.

7. If the passport of the petitioner has already been revoked / impounded in the meantime, it will be open to the petitioner to prefer an appropriate challenge against the same without being prejudiced in any manner by any of the observations made in this order.

8. There will be no order as to costs.

9. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)