Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Muneer Ahmed Quereshi vs State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2013

Bench: D.V.Shylendra Kumar, B.Manohar

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

         DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2013

                           PRESENT

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D V SHYLENDRA KUMAR

                               AND

            THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR

                   CCC [Civil] No.1488 of 2012

BETWEEN:

SRI MUNEER AHMED QUERESHI
S/O M.A. QUERESHI
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/AT NO.42, 3RD MAIN
EAST END MAIN ROAD,
N.A.L. LAYOUT, JAYANAGAR,
4TH " T " BLOCK,
BANGALORE - 560 041                       ...      COMPLAINANT

                    [By Sri J Giriraj, Adv. for
           M/s K M Ravikumar & C Mallikarjuna, Advs.]

AND:

1.     STATE OF KARNATAKA
       DEPARTMENT OF HOME
       REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
       VIDHANA SOUDHA
       BANGALORE - 560 001

2.     JYOTHI PRAKASH MIRJI
       MAJOR
       THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
       INFANTRY ROAD,
       BANGALORE - 560 001
                             2

3.   DEVARAJ
     MAJOR
     THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
     OF POLICE (CRIME)
     INFANTRY ROAD,
     BANGALORE - 560 001

4.   H S REVANNA
     MAJOR
     THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
     SOUTH RANGE, JAYANAGAR
     BANGALORE - 560 004

4(A). DR HARSHA
      MAJOR
      THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
      SOUTH EAST RANGE,
      KORAMANGALA
      BANGALORE - 560 027

5.   RAVIKANTHE GOWDA
     MAJOR
     THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
     CENTRAL INFANTRY ROAD,
     BANGALORE - 560 001

6.   D L RAJAPPA
     MAJOR
     THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
     OF POLICE(WEST)
     ULSOOR,
     BANGALORE - 560 008

7.   BABURAJENDRA PRASAD
     MAJOR
     THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
     BASAVANAGUDI SUB-DIVISION
     BASAVANAGUDI,
     BANGALORE - 560 004

8.   NYAMEGOWDA
     MAJOR
     THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
     ULSOOR GATE SUB-DIVISION
                              3

      KASTURBA ROAD,
      BANGALORE - 560 001

9.    ESMAIL SHARIEF
      MAJOR
      THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
      KENGERI GATE SUB-DIVISION
      BYATARAYANAPURA
      BANGALORE - 560 026

10.   SHIVAMURTHY
      MAJOR
      THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
      SHIVAJINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
      SHIVAJINAGAR
      BANGALORE - 560 001

11.   Y NAGARAJ
      MAJOR
      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
      BASAVANAGUDI POLICE STATION
      BASAVANAGUDI,
      BANGALORE - 560 004

12.   S K UMESH
      MAJOR
      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
      JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION
      JAYANAGAR
      BANGALORE - 560 004

13.   MALLIKARJUN
      MAJOR
      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
      ASHOKNAGAR POLICE STATION
      ASHOKNAGAR
      BANGALORE - 560 008

14.   RAMESH
      MAJOR
      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
      JAGAJEEVANRAMNAGAR POLICE STATION,
      JAGAJEEVANRAMNAGAR
      BANGALORE - 560 026
                              4

15.   R R KALYAN SHETTY
      MAJOR
      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
      TILAKNAGAR POLICE STATION
      TILAKNAGAR
      BANGALORE - 560 004

16.   LOKESH KUMAR
      MAJOR
      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
      KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT POLICE STATION,
      KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT
      BANGALORE - 560 049

17.   SRI MAHANANDA
      MAJOR
      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
      ULSOOR POLICE STATION
      ULSOOR, BANGALORE - 560 008

18.   M K GANAPATHI
      MAJOR
      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
      MADIVALA POLICE STATION
      MADIVALA,
      BANGALORE - 560 027

19.   MURALIDHAR
      MAJOR
      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
      BANASHANKARI POLICE STATION
      BANASHANKARI
      BANGALORE - 560 070            ...     ACCUSED

     THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE
PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT BE PLEASED TO TAKE
NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING
COMMITTED CONTEMPT OF COURT i.e., FOR HAVING WILLFULLY
DISOBEYED THE ORDERS PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN
W.P.NO.7182/2002 DATED 19.6.2006 AND ETC.,

    THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, SHYLENDRA
KUMAR, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                     5

                             ORDER

Complainant in this contempt petition was the petitioner in W.P.No.7182/2002 (GM-Police). The said writ petition was filed by the complainant being aggrieved that his name figured in the rowdy list maintained by as many as more than 10 police stations in Bangalore City and therefore, had sought for a direction to the State Government and the Commissioner of Police, Bangalore, that it was illegal etc., and the writ petition was filed to direct the State Government and Commissioner of Police and sub-ordinate Police Officers to delete his name from the rowdy list etc.

2. This writ petition was allowed as per order dated 19.6.2006 directing as under :-

"8. Therefore, I pass the following order :
The Writ Petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to remove the name of the Petitioner from the Rowdy sheet maintained in their 6 Respondent Nos.11 to 19 / Police Stations. The Respondents are directed not to interfere with the peaceful living of the petitioner. It is made clear that disposal of the Writ Petition shall not come in the way of the Respondents to initiate an action to enlist the name of the Petitioner as 'Rowdy', if his activities comes within the definition of 'Rowdy' as mentioned in Order 1059(1) of the Karnataka Police Manual. No costs."

3. While the respondents were directed to delete the name of the complainant from the list of rowdies maintained at Police Stations figured at respondent Nos.11 to 19, they were also directed not to interfere with his peaceful living and liberty was reserved to initiate action to enlist the name of the complainant, if his activities were thereafter found to be within the definition of 'rowdy' as mentioned in Order 1059(1) of the Karnataka Police Manual.

4. The present contempt petition is now filed on the premise that the complainant's name has not been 7 removed etc. Matter is listed for submission on certain office objections today, such as not giving the name and age of first accused etc.

5. Mr.J. Giriraj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant submits that the matter may be called day after tomorrow.

6. We have looked into the petition, we find the present contempt petition is too stale a matter to be examined further having regard to the nature of the matter and in respect of an order passed in the year 2006. The grievance of the complainant made out now, is in our considered opinion, too late in the day. It is therefore, this contempt petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE NG*