Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

South Western Railway Catering vs The Union Of India on 6 March, 2019

Author: Alok Aradhe

Bench: Alok Aradhe

                           1



     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

        DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019

                        BEFORE

           THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

        WRIT PETITION NO.2993 OF 2019 (GM-TEN)

BETWEEN:

SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY CATERING
CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION (REGD.)
NO 14 Y, 1ST FLOOR, 16TH MAIN,
3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560010
REPRESENTED BY ITS
GENERAL SECRETARY
V.S.MANOGAR S/O LATE D.S.VITAL.          ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI MOHAMMED TAHIR.A., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   THE UNION OF INDIA
     MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
     NEW DELHI -110001
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

2.   THE CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD
     MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS,
     NEW DELHI - 110001

3.   INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING TOURISM
     AND CORPORATION LTD (IRCTC)
     CORPORATE OFFICE AT 11TH AND
     12TH FLOOR, STATEMENT HOUSE,
                          2




     BARAKHAMBA ROAD,
     CONNAUGHT PLACE,
     NEW DELHI - 110001
     REPERSENTED BY ITS
     MANAGING DIRECTOR
     GROUP GENERAL MANAGER/
     PROCUREMENT

4.   INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING
     AND TOURISM CORPORATION,
     REGIONAL OFFICE SITUATED
     AT 2/2, DR.RAJKUMAR RAOD,
     4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGR
     BENGALURU - 560010
     REPRESENTED BY ITS
     REGIONAL MANAGER.                ... RESPONDENTS


     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR
RELEVANT    RECORDS   PENDING    ON    THE   FILE   OF
RESPONDENTS AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED TENDERS BID
DATED 22.01.2019 AND 23.01.2019 FOR PROVISION OF ON-
BOARD CATERING SERVICE IN MAIL/EXPRESS/SUPERFAST
TRAINS AND OTHER TRAINS ISSUED BY THE IRCTS/R-3
ANNEXURED AND MARKED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-C AND
C1 RESPECTIVLEY, BY TREATING IT AS UNJUST, UNFAIR AND
ULTRA VIRES.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                3



                          ORDER

Sri Mohammed Tahir, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.

3. The aforesaid memo is placed on record. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE dh