Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Thankappan vs The District Collector on 26 February, 2019

Author: N.Kirubakaran

Bench: N.Kirubakaran, S.S.Sundar

                                                       1

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             DATED : 26.02.2019

                                                    CORAM:

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN
                                              and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

                                           W.P(MD)No.4381 of 2019

                 Thankappan                                    ... Petitioner

                                                Vs.

                 1.The District Collector,
                   Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil.

                 2.The Tahsildar,
                   Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

                 3.The Executive Officer,
                   Thipparappu Selection Grade Panchayat,
                   Kanyakumari District.

                 4.Ravi
                 5.Thangam
                 6.Gopi
                 7.Rasi
                 8.Rajendran
                 9.Vasantha                                    ... Respondents

                 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India,
                 to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second and third
                 respondents herein to take necessary steps to remove the
                 unauthorised encroachments made in 6 feet width public pathway
                 which       runs   from   Esakki     Amman   Temple,   Saliyath   Street,
                 Aramannam towards Kollakudi Vilai and reached near Thipparappu
                 left side canal bank, Kanyakumari District by the respondents 4 to 9
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                    2

                 herein after affording an opportunity of hearing to them in
                 accordance with law on the basis of the petitioner's representation
                 made before them by RPAD, dated 28.01.2019 within a stipulated
                 time as may be fixed by this Court.


                          For Petitioner   :Mr.B.Brijesh Kishore

                          For R1 and R2    :Mr.A.Muthu Karuppan
                                            Additional Government Pleader
                          For R3           :Mr.M.Rajarajan
                                                   ***

                                                ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.) The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to direct the second and third respondents to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 4 to 9 in 6 feet width public pathway which runs from Esakki Amman Temple, Saliyath Street, Aramannam towards Kollakudi Vilai and reaches near Thipparappu left side canal bank, Kanyakumari District.

2.The petitioner states that he is the resident in Kollakudi Vilai, Aramannam, Cheruppaloor, Kanyakumari District. It is the case of the petitioner that a public pathway about 6 feet width is running from Esakki Amman Temple, Saliyath Street, Aramannam http://www.judis.nic.in 3 towards Kollakudi Vilai is encroached by the respondents 4 to 9.

3.Though the petitioner has made a representation to the third respondent to remove the encroachment, it is stated by the petitioner that the fourth respondent has influenced the third respondent, who in turn, had issued a notice to the petitioner's wife and son on 27.11.2018 and removed the stones worth abut Rs. 15,000/-. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents 2 and 3 have not taken any action against the encroachers, namely, the respondents 4 to 9.

4.Having regard to the grievance of the petitioner, without expresing any opinion on the merits of the representation of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to pass the following order:

"The respondents 2 and 3 are directed to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 25.01.2019 and hold an enquiry in accordance with law and in case the encroachment is found true, take appropriate action against the encroachers, after giving them sufficient opportunity of personal hearing within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

http://www.judis.nic.in 4

5.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.




                                                        [N.K.K., J.] [S.S.S.R., J.]
                                                               26.02.2019
                 Index    : Yes / No
                 Internet : Yes / No
                 cmr


                 To

                 1.The District Collector,

Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil.

2.The Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Executive Officer, Thipparappu Selection Grade Panchayat, Kanyakumari District.

http://www.judis.nic.in 5 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.

and S.S.SUNDAR, J.

cmr W.P(MD)No.4381 of 2019 26.02.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in