Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 8]

Supreme Court of India

Vinod Kumar Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Principal ... on 29 October, 2018

Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2018 SC 664

Author: Kurian Joseph

Bench: A.M. Khanwilkar, Kurian Joseph

                                                                                         NON-REPORTABLE

                                         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                         CIVIL APPEAL     NO(S). 10869/2018

                                    (ARISING FROM SLP(C) No(s).16641/2017)



     VINOD KUMAR SINGH                                                                      APPELLANT(S)


                                                          VERSUS


     THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.                                                      RESPONDENT(S)


                                                  J U D G M E N T

KURIAN, J.

Leave granted. It is a case for compassionate appointment. Though the learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Uttar Pradesh has made a formidable submission inviting our reference to a decision of this Court dismissing the special leave petition by order dated 02.05.2011 passed in CC Nos.6246-6247/2011, in the peculiar facts of this case, we are of the view that this is eminently a fit case for invocation of our plenary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and give a quietus to the dispute.

2. Accordingly, the interim order dated 21.07.2017 passed by this Court for appointment on compassionate grounds, in the peculiar facts of this case, is made absolute and the appeal is disposed of.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by 3. We make it clear that this judgment is passed in NARENDRA PRASAD Date: 2018.11.01 18:31:31 IST

Reason: the very peculiar facts of this case and the same may not be treated as a precedent.

1

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

5. There shall be no orders as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] .......................J. [A.M. KHANWILKAR] NEW DELHI;

OCTOBER 29, 2018.

2