Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of H.P. vs Surender Kumar on 1 September, 2015

Bench: Pinaki Chandra Ghose, R.K. Agrawal

  ITEM NO.108                              COURT NO.13                    SECTION IIB

                                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                 Criminal Appeal    No(s).   1897/2010

  STATE OF H.P.                                                          Appellant(s)

                                                   VERSUS

  SURENDER KUMAR                                                         Respondent(s)

  Date : 01/09/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

  CORAM :
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

  For Appellant(s)
                                     Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Sr.Addl.AG (N.P.)
                                     Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv.

  For Respondent(s)
                                      Ms. Jasleen Chahal,Adv.(A.C.)


                           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                              O R D E R

The Criminal Appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.



                      (VISHAL ANAND)                          (SNEH LATA SHARMA)
                       COURT MASTER                              COURT MASTER

(Signed Order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Vishal Anand Date: 2015.09.01 15:44:34 EAST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No(s). 1897/2010 STATE OF H.P. Appellant(s) VERSUS SURENDER KUMAR Respondent(s) O R D E R We have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant - State of Himachal Pradesh at length today. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 10-9-2009 so passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla.

In view of that, we find no merit in the appeal filed by the appellant - State of H.P. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed. However, we must express our gratitude to Ms. Jasleen Chahal, learned Amicus Curiae who was appearing on behalf of the sole respondent and helped us to come to such a conclusion.

......................J (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) ......................J (R.K. AGRAWAL) NEW DELHI;

1ST SEPTEMBER , 2015.