Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

State Of Gujarat vs Navin Ishvarlal ... on 9 July, 2015

Author: K.M.Thaker

Bench: K.M.Thaker

         R/CR.A/698/2015                             ORDER



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

      CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 698 of 2015
==========================================================
                 STATE OF GUJARAT....Appellant(s)
                            Versus
        NAVIN ISHVARLAL GANDHI....Opponent(s)/Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS MONALI BHATT, APP for the Appellant(s) No. 1
==========================================================

         CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER

                           Date : 09/07/2015


                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard Ms. Monali Bhatt, learned APP for the  appellant ­ State.

2. This Appeal is filed against judgment and order  dated   31.3.2015   passed   by   learned   Sessions   Judge,  Valsad in Special ACB Case No.5 of 20105 whereby the  respondent   herein   is   acquitted   from   the   charge   of  the offence punishable under Sections 713 (1)(d)  and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

3. Learned APP for the respondent State has taken  the   Court   through   impugned   judgment   and   submitted  that the respondent herein is acquitted by the Court  on the basis of benefit of doubt. She also submitted  Page 1 of 2 R/CR.A/698/2015 ORDER that   the   prosecution   has   proved   the   case   by  producing   cogent,   necessary   and   reliable   evidence  but   learned   Judge   has   not   taken   into   account   the  said material and has passed impugned order without  appreciating documentary and oral evidence. 

4. Having   regard   to   the   judgment   and   order   and  considering the submission by learned APP, the Court  is   of   the   view   that   the   Appeal   requires  consideration   and   deserves   to   be   admitted.  Therefore, below mentioned order is passed:­ Appeal is admitted.

Bailable warrant be issued in sum of Rs.2,000/­  against   the   respondent.     Warrant   to   be   served  through concerned Police Station. 

Office   is   directed   to   call   for   Record   and  Proceedings and Paper Book from the concerned Court.

(K.M.THAKER, J.) Bharat Page 2 of 2