Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Union Of India vs M/S Tantia Constructions Limited on 11 January, 2021

Bench: Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha, K.M. Joseph

                                                            1

     ITEM NO.6                     Court 3 (Video Conferencing)                     SECTION XVI

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

             Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                       No(s).     12670/2020

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-03-2020
     in AP No. 732/2018 passed by the High Court At Calcutta)

     UNION OF INDIA                                                                Petitioner(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     M/S TANTIA CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED                                              Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.108662/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

     Date : 11-01-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

     For Petitioner(s)                   Mr.   K.M. Natarj, ASG
                                         Mr.   Sharath Nambiar, Adv
                                         Mr.   Uday P Yadav, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR

     For Respondent(s)                   Mr.   Soumya Chakraborty,Sr. Adv.
                                         Mr.   Raghunath Ghose, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Santanu Ghosh Adv.
                                         Mr.   Nikhil Jain, AOR

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

Having heard Mr. K.M. Nataraj, learned ASG for sometime, it is clear that on the facts of this case, the judgment of the High Court cannot be faulted with. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed. However, reliance has been placed upon a Signature Not Verified recent three-Judge Bench decision of this Court delivered on Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2021.01.11 16:55:30 IST Reason: 17.12.2019 in Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/s ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) A Joint Venture Company, 2019 SCC OnLine 2 1635. We have perused the aforesaid judgment and prima facie disagree with it for the basic reason that once the appointing authority itself is incapacitated from referring the matter to arbitration, it does not then follow that notwithstanding this yet appointments may be valid depending on the facts of the case. We therefore request the Hon’ble Chief Justice to constitute a larger Bench to look into the correctness of this judgment. Pending application stands disposed of.

(R. NATARAJAN)                                        (NISHA TRIPATHI)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                 BRANCH OFFICER