Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Markkoth Ramla vs Valiyaparambath Nabeessa on 25 July, 2024

RSA No.143/2024                                  1/1

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                       PRESENT
                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
             Thursday, the 25th day of July 2024 / 3rd Sravana, 1946
                   C.M.APPLN.NO.1/2024 IN RSA NO. 143 OF 2024
                   OS 19/2021 OF MUNSIFF COURT,NADAPURAM
                       AS 39/2022 OF SUB COURT,VATAKARA
   APPLICANT/APPELLANT:

      1. MARKKOTH RAMLA, AGED 50 YEARS, D/O MAMMAD, RESIDING AT 'CHETHIL'
         PURAMERI AMSOM AND DESOM, VATAKARATALUK, KOZHIKODE - 673503.

   RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

      1. VALIYAPARAMBATH NABEESSA,AGED 73 YEARS, W/O MAMMAD, THUNERI
         VILLAGE, THUNERI DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE - 673505
      2. MARKKOTH NISSAR,AGED 41 YEARS, S/O MAMMAD, TUNERI VILLAGE, TUNERI
         AMSOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE - 673050


         Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed
   therewith the High Court be pleased to codone the delay of 80 days in filing the
   Revision.


         This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application and the
   affidavit filed in support thereof and this court's order dated 18.07.2024 and upon
   hearing the arguments of M/S.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, E.MOHAMMED SHAFI,
   PRAJIT RATNAKARAN, KRISHNAPRIYA R., Advocates for the petitioner and of
   M/S.ARUN KUMAR P., BALAGOPALAN P., ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL, MINI K.KOYERI,
   Advocates for the Respondent No.2, the court passed the following:


                                           ORDER

The delay sought to be condoned in this application was condoned as per order dated 18.07.2024. Subsequently, it came to notice that the delay was condoned without serving notice to the 1st respondent and the service to the 1st respondent was returned with the endorsement 'unknown'.

Hence, the order dated 18.07.2024 in C.M.Appln.No.1/2024 is suo motu reviewed and recalled. Appellant is directed to take steps against R1.

Post on 06.08.2024.

Sd/- M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM,JUDGE 25-07-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar