Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court of India

Valivalam Desikar Chatram Trust vs Assistant Commissioner (Land Reforms) ... on 18 January, 2000

Equivalent citations: AIR2000SC3420, 2000(2)CTC178, JT2000(3)SC383, (2000)9SCC374, AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 3420(1), 2000 (9) SCC 374, 2000 AIR SCW 1887, (2001) 1 LANDLR 603, (2000) 2 LACC 255, (2000) 8 SUPREME 10, (2000) 6 SUPREME 221, (2000) 7 JT 361 (SC), (2000) 3 JT 383 (SC)

Bench: Saghir Ahmad, D.P. Wadhwa

ORDER

1. Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Special Appellate Tribunal constituted under Section 77C of the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act categorically held that the Trust in question was not a public religious trust as defined under Section 2 of the Act as on 1-3-1972 on which date the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) (Third Amendment) Act came into force.

2. Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Special Appellate Tribunal looked into the oral and documentary evidence and considered the statement of the Manager of the Trust recorded by the Land Tribunal. The Manager had stated that there were no entries in the records of the Trust to show that the paddy grown by it was being used for the performance of the puja or for other religious purposes. The account books maintained by the Trust for the period from 1-4-1986 to 31-3-1989, and for the period from 1985-86 to 1988-1989 as also from 1989-90 to 1991-92 were examined. It was thereafter held that there was no evidence to prove that the income was being spent on charity or that the Trust in question was a public religious trust.

3. The corrigendum appended to the deed of trust was executed on 1-7-1981 in which the charities for which the income of the trust was to be utilised were specified. This was done after the third amendment to the Act which came into force in 1972. The corrigendum cannot, therefore, be taken note of particularly in view of the finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal that no part of the income of the Trust was used for charities.

4. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed.