Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

State Bank Of India vs A.K.Nazeer on 30 January, 2004

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                           PRESENT:

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
                              &
             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL

    WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2016/5TH SRAVANA, 1938

                   RFA.No. 596 of 2004 ( )
                   ------------------------


AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN OS 111/2002 of PRINCIPAL SUB
COURT, NORTH PARAVUR DATED 30-01-2004

APPELLANT(S)/PLAINTIFF:
----------------------

           STATE BANK OF INDIA,
            ALUVA TOWN BRANCH, ALUVA,
           REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.


           BY ADV. SRI.R.RAGHUKUMAR (ALUVA)

RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANTS:
-------------------------

          1. A.K.NAZEER, S/O.KUNJU MOHAMMED,
           PROPRIETOR, M/S.A.A.K.INDUSTRIES,, ELAMANA HOUSE,
           PARAMBAYAM, NEDUMBASSERY P.O.

          2. M/S.A.A.K. FIBRES (P) LTD.,
           NEDUMBASSERY, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
           A.K.NAZEER, S/O.KUNJU MOHAMMED, ELAMANA HOUSE,
           PARAMBAYAM, NEDUMBASSERY P.O.

          3. MR.A.K.NAZEER, MANAGING DIRECTOR,
           S/O.KUNJU MOHAMMED, A.A.K.FIBRES (P) LTD.,
           ELAMANA HOUSE, PARAMBAYAM, NEDUMBASSERY P.O.

          4. SAJITHA, W/O.NAZEER, DIRECTOR,
           A.A.K.FIBRES (P) LTD., ELAMANA HOUSE,
           PARAMBAYAM, NEDUMBASSERY P.O.


           R1 TO R4 BY ADVS. SRI.SHAJI CHIRAYATH
                              SMT.JIJI M. VARKEY

       THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 27-07-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:


OKB



           V.CHITAMBARESH & K.HARILAL, JJ.
           ---------------------
                  R.F.A. No.596 of 2004
           ---------------------
         Dated this the 27th day of July, 2016


                       JUDGMENT

Chitambaresh, J.

There is no representation for the appellant.

The respondents submit that the loan account has been closed.

The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

K.HARILAL, Judge.

okb/-