Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Jintan vs Government on 14 November, 2011

Author: Abhilasha Kumari

Bench: Abhilasha Kumari

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/3688/1999	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3688 of 1999
 

 
 
=====================================================
 

JINTAN
CLINICAL THERMOMETRE CO (INDIA) PVT LTD & 1 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

GOVERNMENT
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=====================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
JD AJMERA for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. 
Ms.Archana Rawal,learned
Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. 
M/S
THAKKAR ASSOC. for Respondent(s) :
3, 
=====================================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HON'BLE
			SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 29/12/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER 

In the present petition, letter dated 7-9-1998 of the Deputy Town Planner, Surendranagar has been impugned, whereby the petitioners have been directed to make a provision for a common plot out of Final Plot No.66 admeasuring 14638 Sq.Mts. allotted to them in lieu of their original plot. Mr.J.D.Ajmera,learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per Town Planning Scheme No.1 of Surendranagar sanctioned by the State Government on 5-11-1990 which came into force with effect from 18-12-1990, (a copy of which is annexed as Annexure R-1 to the further affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondents Nos.1 and 2), there is a provision to reserve an area admeasuring 333 sq.mts. per Hectare for a common plot whereas the respondents have reserved an area in excess of this.

There is no dispute between the parties that some area has to be reserved for a common plot. The controversy is, how much area is to be so reserved.

Ms.Archana Rawal,learned Assistant Government Pleader, seeks time to obtain instructions in order to clarify the position. List the matter tomorrow i.e. on 30 12-2008.

(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari,J) arg     Top