Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Praveen Kumar Arora vs Ministry Of Defence on 17 September, 2019

                               के ीय सूचना आयोग
                         Central Information Commission
                            बाबा गंगनाथ माग, मुिनरका
                          Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                          नई द ली, New Delhi - 110067

File No : CIC/DODEF/A/2018/620838

Praveen Kumar Arora                                           ....अपीलकता/Appellant
                                      VERSUS
                                       बनाम
CPIO,
O/o Cantonment Board,
Sadar Bazar,
Jhansi Cantt - 284001                                     .... ितवादीगण /Respondent

RTI application filed on          :   03/01/2018
CPIO replied on                   :   No reply
First appeal filed on             :   04/02/2018
First Appellate Authority order   :   No order
Second Appeal dated               :   Nil diarized on 17/05/2018
Date of Hearing                   :   17/09/2019
Date of Decision                  :   17/09/2019

            lwpuk vk;qDr              :       fnO; izdk"k flUgk
   INFORMATION COMMISSIONER :             DIVYA PRAKASH SINHA

Information sought

:

The Appellant sought to know the total area in square feet that was mutated in the name of Prem Kishore Arora vide CBR no. 01 dated 29.09.2014.
Grounds for the Second Appeal:
The CPIO has not provided the desired information.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present:-
1
Appellant: Not present.
Respondent: Ashutosh Verma, Town Planning Asstt. & Draftsman & Rep. of CPIO, Cantonment Board, Jhansi present through VC.
Rep. of CPIO submitted that appropriate reply has been provided to the Appellant on 26.08.2019 i.e., after receiving notice for hearing. He regretted for the same because area calculation was not available readily and clearance had to be obtained from higher authorities under Southern Command, Pune.
On Commission's instance, Rep. of CPIO mentioned that Mayank Mani Chaturvedi, Chief Cantt. Engineer is the CPIO from the date of receipt of RTI Application and could not attend the hearing because of a building collapse in the area.
Decision Appellant has not availed the opportunity to appear before the Commission to plead his case/contest CPIO's submission. Commission upholds the submission of the CPIO. No further action lies.
Commission severely reprimands Mayank Mani Chaturvedi, Chief Cantt. Engineer, CPIO for sending delayed response to the Appellant. A copy of the order is also marked to CEO for taking note of adverse observations of the Commission.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Divya Prakash Sinha ( द काश िस हा ) Information Commissioner ( सूचना आयु ) 2 File No : CIC/DODEF/A/2018/620838 Authenticated true copy (अ भ मा णत स या पत त) Haro Prasad Sen Dy. Registrar 011-26106140 / [email protected] हरो साद सेन, उप-पंजीयक दनांक / Date Copy to:
Chief Executive Officer Cantonment Board, Sadar Bazar, Jhansi Cantt. - 284001
-- (for taking note of adverse observations of the Commission) --
3