Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Chattisgarh High Court

Shashank Agrawal vs Pawan Kumar Agrawal 12 Wpt/1/2019 M/S ... on 11 February, 2019

Bench: Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Parth Prateem Sahu

                                                               1


                                                                                                  NAFR
                                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                                                   Writ Appeal No. 48 of 2019

               {Arising out of order dated 29.10.2018 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition
                                               (227) No. 927 of 2018}

                        Shashank Agrawal, aged about 16 years, S/o Sudhir Kumar Agrawal, Minor,
                         Through Next Friend Father Sudhir Kumar Agrawal, Resident - Pratap Chowk
                         Saraswati Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                                                      ---- Appellant
                                                          Versus
                     1. Pawan Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri Harchand Agrawal, Resident-Village
                        Tenganmada, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
                     2. Nagar Panchayat Through Competent Officer Ratanpur Village and Post
                        Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
                     3. C.G. State, Through Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                                                 ---- Respondents

For Appellant : Shri Prasanjeet Dutta, Advocate. For Respondent No.3/State : Ms. Richa Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Judgment on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 11.02.2019

1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and learned Deputy Government Advocate for the State on I.A. No. 2 of 2019, application for permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to agitate the issue involved in this appeal before the trial Court.

2. Learned counsel for the Respondent has no objection.

3. For the reasons indicated in paragraph 1 of I.A. No. 2 of 2019, the present writ appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

                                  Sd/-                                                     Sd/-

                          (Ajay Kumar Tripathi)                                 (Parth Prateem Sahu)
                              Chief Justice                                            Judge
Brijmohan