Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gauhati High Court

M/S. Parbati Enterprises A ... vs The State Of Assam Rep. By The Secretary ... on 25 February, 2019

Author: Arup Kumar Goswami

Bench: Arup Kumar Goswami

                                                                                 Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010031072019




                                THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                      Case No. : WP(C) 1004/2019

             1:M/S. PARBATI ENTERPRISES A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM AND A REGD.
             GOVT. CONTRACTOR AND GENERAL ORDER SUPPLIERS, REP. BY ITS
             PROPRIETOR- SRI PRADIP SAIKIA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AND PRINCIPAL
             PLACE OF BUSINESS AT PUBERUN PATH, HATIGAON, P.O. AND P.S.
             HATIGAON, GUWAHATI-781038, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.

                          VERSUS

             1:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF
             ASSAM, HOME DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.

             2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
             ASSAM ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTER ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007.

             3:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMN.)
             ASSAM ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTER ULUBARI GUWAHATI-07.

             4:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE SUPPLY BRANCH
             ASSAM POLICE HEAD QUARTER ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007

Advocate for the Petitioner     : MR. A BHATTACHARYA

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM

                                    BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI

                                               ORDER

Date : 25-02-2019 Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned State counsel, appearing for all the respondents.

Mr. Dhar submits that he has received instructions and based on the same, he would like to file an affidavit.

Page No.# 2/2 Prayer is allowed.

It is seen that in this case, no notice was formally issued. Accordingly, issue notice of motion, returnable on 12th March, 2019. No formal steps with regard to the respondents are called for as they are duly represented. However, extra copies of the writ petition be served upon Mr. Dhar.

The petitioner may file its reply affidavit on or before the next date fixed. Interim order passed earlier shall continue till then.

Sd/-

JUDGE M. Sharma Comparing Assistant