Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

L.V.Lalitha vs The District Collector on 16 July, 2019

Author: M.Dhandapani

Bench: M.Dhandapani

                                                            1

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED :16.07.2019

                                                        CORAM

                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

                                               W.P.No. 22741 of 2008
                                                         and
                                           M.P.Nos. 2,3 of 2008 & 1 of 2009

                      L.V.Lalitha                                                      ..Petitioner

                                                           vs

                      1. The District Collector
                         Krishnagiri District
                         Krishnagiri

                      2. The Special Tahsildhar
                              ( Land Acquisition )
                         SIPCOT
                         Hosur
                         Krishnagiri District.

                      3. The State of Tamil Nadu
                         rep. by Secretary to Government
                         Industries Department
                         Fort St.George
                         Chennai – 600 009.                                        .. Respondents

                      Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                      praying to issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of writ of
                      Certiorari, calling for the records relating to Notification passed by the 3rd
                      respondent in G.O.Ms.No.108, Industries (MIG-2) dated 07.09.2006
                      published by the Industries Department at Part II Section 2 of Tamil
                      Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary dated 07.09.2006 in respect of
                      the petitioner's property situated at S.No.275 (Dry) measuring an extent




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                            2

                      of 2.34.5 hectares in Moranapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri
                      District and quash the same.


                                  For Petitioner      : M/s.R.Poornima
                                  For Respondents      : Mr.J.Ramesh,
                                                         Additional Government Pleader.


                                                       ORDER

The petitioner filed this Writ Petition praying for a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to Notification passed by the 3rd respondent in G.O.Ms.No.108, (MIG-2) dated 07.09.2006, published by the Industries Department at Part II Section 2 of Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary dated 07.09.2006, in respect of the petitioner's property situated at S.No.275 (Dry) measuring an extent of 2.34.5 hectares in Moranapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District and quash the same.

2. The property situated in Survey No.275, (Dry) measuring an extent of 5.79 acres (2.34.5 hect.) in Moranapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, hereinafter referred to as 'the property' originally belonged to the petitioner's father Venkata Subbarao. Her father executed a registered Dhana Settlement Deed dated 01.10.1992, relating to the property in her favour. The possession of the property was http://www.judis.nic.in 3 delivered to her. The Gift Deed was accepted by her and acted upon by all the parties concerned. All the revenue records got changed in her name. The petitioner have also paid tax and land revenues to the property.

3. The petitioner's father died on 04.12.1999 and his legal heirs are Kamalamma (Wife); Indira (daughter); Sathiyanarayanan (son); Krishnamoorthy (son); Lalitha (herself) and Saroja (daughter). As mentioned above, the petitioner is only entitled to the property by virtue of the Settlement Deed referred above and the other legal heirs have no right over the property.

4. The petitioner has filed the writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings. While entertaining the writ petition, this Court has granted interim orders. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo dated 13.06.2019 stating that he has returned the papers to the petitioner. Today, no one represented on behalf of the petitioner.

5. The second respondent has filed counter stating that in respect of W.P.Nos. 7870 and 8130 of 2007, the land owners were already sold their lands covered in the 'C' Form Notice to other persons before passing http://www.judis.nic.in 4 award. After examining all the relevant factors, the Government have decided and approved notice in Form 'C' and published in Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No.238 Extra ordinary Part II, Section II at page 3-4 dated 07.09.2006. Also the possession of the lands covered in that 'C' Form Notice was taken on 01.12.2006 after publishing 'E' Form Notice to the interested persons.

6. In view of the above and since the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.07.2019 Index:Yes / No Internet: Yes / No Speaking / Non-Speaking order kmm http://www.judis.nic.in 5 To

1. The District Collector Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri

2. The Special Tahsildhar ( Land Acquisition ) SIPCOT Hosur Krishnagiri District.

3. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary to Government Industries Department Fort St.George Chennai – 600 009.

http://www.judis.nic.in 6 M.DHANDAPANI, J., kmm W.P.No. 22741 of 2008 http://www.judis.nic.in