Punjab-Haryana High Court
Gagandeep Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 3 February, 2021
Author: Hari Pal Verma
Bench: Hari Pal Verma
CRM-M-33325-2020 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
201a CRM-M-33325-2020
Date of Decision:03.02.2021
Gagandeep Singh and others .....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA.
Present: None.
****
HARI PAL VERMA, J.(Oral)
The matter has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing due to outbreak of COVID-19.
Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.0110 dated 07.04.2020 under Sections 420, 120-B IPC (the offence under Section 406 IPC was added later on) and Section 13 of Punjab Prevention of Human Smuggling Act, 2012, registered at Police Station Tripri Patiala, District Patiala (Annexure P-1) and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise dated 29.09.2020 (Annexure P-2).
This Court vide order dated 16.10.2020 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned trial court was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patiala and got their statements 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2021 20:17:21 ::: CRM-M-33325-2020 -2- recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 24.12.2020 to the effect that the compromise effected between the parties is genuine, voluntarily, without any pressure, coercion or threat.
Though no one is present on behalf of respondent No.2- complainant Balwinder Singh in Court today, but no prejudice would be caused to him as he has already made a statement with regard to compromise before learned Magistrate on 10.12.2020. The same is reproduced as under:-
"Stated that I am the complainant of present case FIR no.110 dated 7.4.2020, U/ss 420/120-B/406 IPC (offence U/s 406 IPC added later on) and U/s 13 of the Punjab Prevention of Human Smuggling Act, 2012 registered at P.S Tripuri, Patiala against accused Gagandeep Singh, Kamaljit Kaur, Pushpinder Singh @ Rubal and Parminder Kaur. Now due to intervention of respectables of locality and common friends, I have compromised with the accused Gagandeep Singh, Parminder Kaur and Pushipinder Singh @ Rubal voluntarily and without any pressure, coercion or threat. I produce copy of compromise Ex.C1 and I identify my signatures at point A on the same. I have no objection if present FIR and proceedings arising out of present FIR against the accused Gagandeep Singh, Parminder Kaur and Pushpinder Singh @ Rubal are quashed by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court. I am giving this statement voluntarily and without any pressure, coercion or threat. The compromise between me and accused Gagandeep Singh, Parminder Kaur and Pushpinder Singh @ Rubal is genuine."
Though statements of the petitioners-accused have also been recorded, but in view of the fact that complainant-respondent No.2- Balwinder Singh has suffered the statement, in support of the compromise, 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2021 20:17:23 ::: CRM-M-33325-2020 -3- this Court does not find any impedement in quashing the present FIR on the basis of compromise.
In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R.
Thus, following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, as approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.0110 dated 07.04.2020 under Sections 420, 120-B IPC (the offence under Section 406 IPC was added later on) and Section 13 of Punjab Prevention of Human Smuggling Act, 2012, registered at Police Station Tripri Patiala, District Patiala (Annexure P-1) and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners on the basis of compromise dated 29.09.2020 (Annexure P-2), however, subject to payment of costs of `15,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners, within a period of one month from today with the Bar Association of this Court.
Since the present order is being passed in the absence of respective lawyers of the parties, in case either party finds that any prejudice has been caused to them, they shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present petition.
February 03, 2021 (HARI PAL VERMA)
seema JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No
3 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 04-02-2021 20:17:23 :::