Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 79]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Commissioner Of Central Excise ... vs Bill Forge Pvt Ltd on 8 June, 2016

        

 

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH
BANGALORE

Application(s) Involved:

E/MISC/49/2010, E/MISC/20391/2016    in    E/786/2006-DB

Appeal(s) Involved:

E/786/2006-DB 



[Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 55-2006 dated 27/04/2006 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise(Appeals) Bangalore]

For approval and signature:

HON'BLE SHRI S.S GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON'BLE SHRI ASHOK K. ARYA, TECHNICAL MEMBER

1
Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?
no
2
Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?
seen
3
Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the Order?
yes
4
Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental authorities?
yes

Commissioner of Central Excise ,Customs and Service Tax BANGALORE-I
POST BOX NO 5400...CR BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE, - 560001
Appellant(s)




Versus



BILL FORGE PVT LTD, 
# 9C, VOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA, HOSUR ROAD, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE-560099 
Respondent(s)

Appearance:

Smt Uma Banawalkar, A.R. For the Appellant Shri M.A. Narayana, Adv For the Respondent Date of Hearing: 08/06/2016 Date of Decision: 08/06/2016 CORAM:
HON'BLE SHRI S.S GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON'BLE SHRI ASHOK K. ARYA, TECHNICAL MEMBER Final Order No. 20397 / 2016 Per : S.S GARG Revenue has filed miscellaneous application seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the amount of duty involved is Rs 2,51,910/- and the same is less than the monetary limit fixed by the Board vide CBEC Instruction F.No. 390/Misc./163/2010-JC dated 17.12.2015.

2. On a careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides and perusal of the records, we allow the miscellaneous application for withdrawal of the appeal. Accordingly appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (Order pronounced in open court) ASHOK K. ARYA TECHNICAL MEMBER S.S GARG JUDICIAL MEMBER pnr 2