Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Bhagirath S/O Sh. Raja Ram vs State Of Nct Of Delhi Through Chief ... on 5 July, 2024

Author: Manoj Kumar Ohri

Bench: Manoj Kumar Ohri

                                    $~12
                                    *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                    +    W.P.(CRL) 1229/2024
                                         BHAGIRATH S/O SH. RAJA RAM                      .....Petitioner
                                                         Through: Mr. Kunal Malhotra, Mr. Ravinder
                                                                  Gaur, Mr. Rahul Chaprana, Ms.
                                                                  Rinku, Mr. Aman Arora and Mr.
                                                                  Milan Malhotra, Advocates.
                                                         versus

                                                STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
                                                THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY                     .....Respondent
                                                              Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC (Crl.) for the
                                                                         State with Inspector Rajpal Meena PS
                                                                         Bindapur, Delhi.
                                                CORAM:
                                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
                                                              ORDER

% 05.07.2024

1. By way of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the rejection order No.F.10 (3708571/CJ/Legal/PHQ/2024/16506 dated 08.03.2024 passed by the Office of Director General of Prisons, Prison HQs, Tihar, Janak Puri New Delhi (in case FIR No. 07/2009 registered under Sections 302/397/34 IPC at PS Bindapur, Delhi) whereby the petitioner's application for grant of furlough was declined on the ground that he does not have a good conduct as he had surrendered late by 129 days on 21.06.2021 when he was earlier released on emergency parole vide order dated 23.04.2020.

2. Mr. Kunal Malhotra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the late surrender was on account of confusion because of HPC Guidelines as well as on account of the medical condition of the petitioner.

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/07/2024 at 01:26:04 He submits that the petitioner was issued only a minor warning and thereafter has also been granted the benefit of furlough twice in the years 2022 and 2023. He, on instructions further states that though it was alleged that the petitioner was involved in one more case during the release on emergency parole, however, he now stands discharged in the said case being FIR No.275/2020 registered under Sections 308/341/506/511/34 IPC at PS Delhi Cantt.

3. Mr. Amol Sinha, learned ASC (Crl.) appearing for the State submits that the only reason for rejection of the petitioner's application seeking furlough was his earlier late surrender. He further states there is no other impediment in consideration of the application seeking furlough and that the petitioner has been released on furlough twice thereafter.

4. Considering that the only reason assigned in the impugned order is the late surrender and the fact that the order did not consider the subsequent release of the petitioner on two occasions.

5. For all of the aforesaid reasons, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on furlough for a period of three weeks, on his furnishing two sureties of Rs.5,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent, subject to the following conditions:

i) During the period the petitioner remains out on furlough, he will remain at his residence and shall report to the SHO of the concerned police station on every Saturday at 12:00.
ii) The petitioner shall also provide to the concerned SHO with mobile telephone number which shall be kept in working condition at all times and shall not switch off This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/07/2024 at 01:26:04 or change the mobile number without prior intimation to the SHO concerned. The mobile location be kept on at all times.

iii) The petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not communicate with or come in contact with the complainant/victim or any member of the complainant/victim's family or tamper with the evidence of the case.

iv)The petitioner is directed to surrender before the jail authorities at the expiry of the period of furlough.

6. The petition is disposed of in terms of the above.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JULY 5, 2024/rd This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/07/2024 at 01:26:05