Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Madhu vs State By Bmtf Police on 21 November, 2013

Author: H N Nagamohan Das

Bench: H.N.Nagamohan Das

                            1

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

      DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013

                        BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS

            CRIMINAL PETITION NO.927/2013

BETWEEN:

1.    MADHU,
      S/O LATE M.RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
      AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
      ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
      BANASHANKARI SUB-DIVISION,
      BBMP 8TH MAIN, 7TH B CROSS,
      B.S.K.II STAGE,
      BANGALORE-560027.

2.    NAGARAJAIAH.P.J.,
      S/O RANGAIAH,
      AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
      WORKING AS ASST. ENGINEER,
      WARD NO.167 IN OFFICE OF
      ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
      BBMP 8TH B MAIN,
      17TH B CROSS, B.S.K.II STAGE,
      BANGALORE-560027.               ... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI V.SRINIVAS, ADV.)

AND

STATE BY BMTF POLICE,
BBMP BUILDING, NR SQUARE,
BANGALORE-560001.                     ... RESPONDENT

(BY SRI K.NAGESHWARAPPA, GP)

    THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR. NO.4/2013 ON
                                  2

THE FILE OF THE C.M.M., BANGALORE FILED BY THE
RESPONDENT POLICE.

    THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON                      FOR
ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE                        THE
FOLLOWING:

                            ORDER

At the instance of private person, the Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force (for short `the Task Force') registered criminal case against the petitioner in Cr. No.04/2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 217, 214, 109 of IPC and Section 321(B) of KMC Act.

2. This Court in Crl.P.No.5340/2012 and connected matters vide order dated 10.10.2013 held that the Task Force has no jurisdiction to register a case for the offences punishable under the IPC. For the reasons stated in the order in Crl.P.No.5340/2012 and on the same terms the following;

ORDER

i) The petition is hereby allowed.

ii) The proceedings in Cr. No.04/2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 217, 214, 109 of IPC are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

JUDGE VM