Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Jito K. Poulose vs State Of Kerala on 4 March, 2017

Author: K.Abraham Mathew

Bench: K.Abraham Mathew

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                             PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

                 THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE 2017/1ST ASHADHA, 1939

                                   WP(C).No. 17658 of 2017 (F)
                                       ----------------------------


PETITIONER:
------------------

                      JITO K. POULOSE
                      AGED 20 YEARS,
                      S/O. POULOSE, KANNAMPUZHA HOUSE,
                      CHAMPANNOR, ANGAMALY SOUTH P.O,
                     ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT


                      BY ADV. SRI.VIJAI MATHEWS

RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------

        1.           STATE OF KERALA
                      REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
                      HOME DEPARTMENT,
                      SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001

        2.           DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
                      POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,
                      VAZHUTHACADU P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001

        3.           INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
                      ERNAKULAM RANGE, ERNAKULAM PIN 682 031

        4.           SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                      ERNAKULAM RURAL, ALUVA PIN 683101

        5.           CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                      ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 683572

        6.           SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
                      CHENGAMANAD POLICE STATION,
                      CHENGAMANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 683578

                      BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T. R. RENJITH

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
             ON 22-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
             FOLLOWING:
sdr/-

WP(C).No. 17658 of 2017 (F)
----------------------------

                                             APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1          TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO 283/2017,DATED 04-03-2017

EXHIBIT P2          TRUE COPY OF THE FI STATEMENT IN IN CRIME NO 283/2017,
                    DATED 04-03-2017

EXHIBIT P3          TRUE COPY OF THE SCENE MAHZAR IN CRIME NO 283/2017,
                     DATED 07-03-2017

EXHIBIT P4          TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN MALAYALA
                     MANORAMA DAILY, DATED 7-3-2017

EXHIBIT P5          TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN MADHYAMAM DAILY,
                     DATED 7-3-2017

EXHIBIT P6          TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN TO THE DISTRICT POLICE
                     CHIEF, DATED 10-04-2017

EXHIBIT P7          TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN TO THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
                     OF POLICE, DATED 26-04-2017

EXHIBIT P8          TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN TO THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
                     OF POLICE, DATED 12-05-2017

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS                   NIL
----------------------------------------




                                                          /TRUE COPY/




                                                          PA TO JUDGE




sdr/-



                K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
             --------------------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No. 17658 of 2017
             --------------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2017


                        J U D G M E N T

1.Crime No.283/2017 of Chengamanad Police Station is registered for the offences under Sections 307, 323, 324, 342, 365, 394 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim is the petitioner. His prayer in this writ petition is to direct the Director General of Police and Inspector General of Police, Ernakulam Range to hand over the investigation of the case to the Crime Branch unit of the State Police.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3.It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that one accused has already been arrested and released on bail and another accused has been identified and the properties involved in the matter have been recovered. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner W.P.(C) No. 17658 of 2017 ..2..

is that this development took place only after the filing of this writ petition. But, it appears that the investigating officer is at present making earnest efforts to investigate the case honestly. So, I think this writ petition can be closed. The petitioner will have the liberty to approach this Court, if he is not satisfied with the progress of the investigation. In the result, the writ petition is closed with the above observations.

Sd/-

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE bka/-