Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Dr. Partha Pratim Samui vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 29 July, 2016

Author: Nishita Mhatre

Bench: Nishita Mhatre

                                                  1

 29.07.2016
 Item No.1
    ad
                                       W.P.S.T 137 of 2016

                                    Dr. Partha Pratim Samui
                                               Vs.
                                 The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. D.N Ray,
Mr. Rajesh Kr. Shah,
Mr. B Nandy .......              For the petitioner

Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee,
Mr. Nilatpal Chatterjee  ......          For the State

           The grievance of the petitioner is that the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal had
granted one month for the respondents to accept resignation of the petitioner. According to the

petitioner, if the acceptance of the resignation is delayed and the release order is not furnished immediately, he would not be able to join his new place of employment at which place he has to report on 31st July, 2016.

We have heard this matter at length.

Mr. Mukherjee, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that there is no need to interfere with the impugned order as the time frame for acceptance of the resignation letter mentioned in the West Bengal Service Rules is three months. According to him, the Tribunal has reduced it to one month. He submits that several procedural requirements have to be fulfilled including the vigilance clearance and other formalities and, therefore, at least one month would be required.

The respondents have now furnished for our perusal a letter dated 28th July, 2016 addressed to the advocate for the State and signed by the Director of Medical Education & Ex- Officio Secretary, Government of West Bengal stating that the resignation of the petitioner is accepted, subject to the vigilance clearance by the department for which the file was sent on 11th July, 2016 for completion of the procedural requirements in accordance with law. The letter also mentions that the resignation would be accepted subject to payment of salary for the shortfall of two months of the required period of three months' notice.

According to Mr. Mukherjee, the letter accepting the resignation of the petitioner would be furnished to him during the course of the day. However, the release order will be issued only after the requirements are completed including payment of the shortfall of the salary.

We accept this statement made on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner may produce the letter accepting his resignation to his new employer so that he can join at the new place of employment.

2

We accept the statement made by Mr. Mukherjee that the release order will be issued within four weeks from today.

The petition is disposed of.

Photostat plain copy of this order countersigned by the Assistant Registrar (Court) be given to the parties after observing all formalities.

(Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.) 3